CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

ARCHIE: Exploring Language Learner Behaviors in LLM Chatbot-Supported Active Reading Log Data with Epistemic Network Analysis

Open access
Woollaston, Steve, Flanagan, Brendan, Ocheja, Patrick, Toyokawa, Yuko, Ogata, Hiroaki·2025·Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference
DOI 10.1145/3706468.3706556
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3706468.3706556

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLMs have demonstrated substantial capabilities in educational practice, e.g., automatic grading, answer generation, and student-chatbot interaction.

    “Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial capabilities in educational practice, e.g., automatic grading (Ferreira Mello et al., 2025), answer generation (Rodrigues et al., 2025), and student-chatbot interaction (Woollaston et al., 2025; Hao et al., 2026; Zhang et al., 2025).”

    From Assessing the Impact and Underlying Pathways of Sequenced AI feedback on Student Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Woollaston et al., 2025

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woollaston, S., Flanagan, B., Ocheja, P., Toyokawa, Y., & Ogata, H.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-03-03
Pages
642-654
DOI
10.1145/3706468.3706556
OpenAlex
W4407842494
Cited by
10
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 1
FWCI
55.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science ((B) JP20H01722, JP23H01001, (Exploratory) JP21K19824, 22KJ1914, (A) JP23H00505)
  • New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (JPNP20006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
LLM chatbots, epistemic network analysis, reading comprehension, AI-assisted language learning, learner metacognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review