Cited by 58EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The effects of chatbot use on foreign language reading anxiety and reading performance among Chinese secondary school students

Open access
Zheng, Shuyan·2024·Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The present study investigates the effectiveness of a GenAI-based chatbot, “Reading Bot,” in reducing foreign language reading anxiety (FLRA) and improving foreign language reading performance (FLRP) among Chinese secondary school students learning English as a foreign language (EFL). To do so, a mixed-methods quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design with qualitative interviews was employed. After ensuring homogeneity between the two groups, one class was designated as the experimental group (n = 42), utilizing a chatbot as a treatment, while the other class served as the comparison group (n = 42), receiving traditional teacher support. Both groups participated in five 45-min reading practice sessions. The results indicated that the chatbot intervention significantly reduced the participants' FLRA within the experimental group when comparing pre- and post-test scores. However, no significant differences were found between the two groups after the treatment, either in FLRA or FLRP. The qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews suggested that the chatbot provided technological, pedagogical, linguistic, and affective affordances to assist reading. Nevertheless, the analysis also revealed some potential drawbacks and challenges to a GenAI-enhanced approach to reading instruction that may have influenced FLRA and FLRP. The theoretical and pedagogical implications of these findings are discussed, along with potential directions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100271

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, S.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Shuyan
Venue
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
7
Pages
100271
ISSN
2666-920X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400913152
Cited by
58
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 3
FWCI
91.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
chatbot-assisted language learning, foreign language reading anxiety, reading achievement, English as a foreign language, high school students, generative AI in education, reading instruction, Chinese learners of English

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review