Who is Helping Whom? Student Concerns about AI-Teacher Collaboration in Higher Education Classrooms
Open accessAbstract
AI's integration into education promises to equip teachers with data-driven insights and intervene in student learning. Despite the intended advancements, there is a lack of understanding of interactions and emerging dynamics in classrooms where various stakeholders including teachers, students, and AI, collaborate. This paper aims to understand how students perceive the implications of AI in Education (AIEd) in terms of classroom collaborative dynamics, especially AI used to observe students and notify teachers to provide targeted help. Using the story completion method, we analyzed narratives from 65 participants, highlighting three challenges: AI decontextualizing of the educational context; AI-teacher cooperation with bias concerns and power disparities; AI's impact on student behavior that further challenges AI's effectiveness. We argue that for effective and ethical AI-facilitated cooperative education, future AIEd design must factor in the situated nature of implementation. Designers must consider the broader nuances of the education context, impacts on multiple stakeholders, dynamics involving these stakeholders, and the interplay among potential consequences for AI systems and stakeholders. It is crucial to understand the values in the situated context, the capacity and limitations of both AI and human for effective cooperation, and any implications to the relevant ecosystem.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some students prefer automated assistance over human support to avoid feeling judged.
“Some research suggests some students prefer automated assistance over human support to avoid feeling judged [54, 113]”
From AI Sensing and Intervention in Higher Education: Student Perceptions of Learning Impacts, Affective Responses, and Ethical Priorities (2026) · cites this paper as [54]
Section 4.3 reports that some students may rely on the system instead of seeking help directly from teachers. It describes the system as a way to obtain teacher assistance, however, and does not say students take this route to avoid feeling judged. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDiscomfort from being observed by AIEd may trigger behavioural change and undermine the technology's effectiveness.
“For instance, discomfort from being observed by AIEd may trigger behavioural change [53] and undermine the technology's effectiveness [54].”
From AI Sensing and Intervention in Higher Education: Student Perceptions of Learning Impacts, Affective Responses, and Ethical Priorities (2026) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 124 · Cited by 31
Research works printed but not linked: 120
- Atezaz Ahmad, Jan Schneider, Dai Griffiths, Daniel Biedermann, Daniel Schiffner, Wolfgang Greller and Hendrik Drachsler. 2022. Connecting the dots-A literature review on learning analytics indicators from a learning design perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
- Karan Ahuja, Dohyun Kim, Franceska Xhakaj, Virag Varga, Anne Xie, Stanley Zhang, Jay Eric Townsend, Chris Harrison, Amy Ogan and Yuvraj Agarwal. 2019. EduSense: Practical classroom sensing at Scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3, 1-26.
- Karan Ahuja, Deval Shah, Sujeath Pareddy, Franceska Xhakaj, Amy Ogan, Yuvraj Agarwal and Chris Harrison. 2021. Classroom Digital Twins with Instrumentation-Free Gaze Tracking. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Yokohama, Japan, Article 484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445711 · DOI
- Ashraf Alam and Atasi Mohanty. 2022. Foundation for the Future of Higher Education or 'Misplaced Optimism'? Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. In International Conference on Innovations in Intelligent Computing and Communications. Springer, 17-29.
- Bryan Alexander, Kevin Ashford-Rowe, Noreen Barajas-Murph, Gregory Dobbin, Jessica Knott, Mark McCormack, Jeffery Pomerantz, Ryan Seilhamer and Nicole Weber. 2019. Horizon report 2019 higher education edition. 2019.
- Daniela Altun, Christopher Krauss, Alexander Streicher, Christoph Mueller, Daniel Atorf, Lisa Rerhaye and Dietmar Kunde. 2022. Lessons Learned from Creating, Implementing and Evaluating Assisted E-Learning Incorporating Adaptivity, Recommendations and Learning Analytics. In International Conference on Human- Computer Interaction. Springer, 257-270.
- Nese Alyuz, Eda Okur, Utku Genc, Sinem Aslan, Cagri Tanriover and Asli Arslan Esme. 2017. An unobtrusive and multimodal approach for behavioral engagement detection of students. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI International Workshop on Multimodal Interaction for Education. Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, UK, 26-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3139513.3139521 · DOI
- Dana Alzoubi, Jameel Kelley, Evrim Baran, Stephen B. Gilbert, Aliye Karabulut Ilgu and Shan Jiang. 2021. TeachActive Feedback Dashboard: Using Automated Classroom Analytics to Visualize Pedagogical Strategies at a Glance. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Yokohama, Japan, Article 312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451709 · DOI
- Pengcheng An, Saskia Bakker, Sara Ordanovski, Ruurd Taconis, Chris LE Paffen and Berry Eggen. 2019. Unobtrusively enhancing reflection-in-action of teachers through spatially distributed ambient information. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1-14.
- Cecilia Aragon, Clayton Hutto, Andy Echenique, Brittany Fiore-Gartland, Yun Huang, Jinyoung Kim, Gina Neff, Wanli Xing and Joseph Bayer. 2016. Developing a research agenda for human-centered data science. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing companion. 529-535.
- Kimberly E Arnold and Matthew D Pistilli. 2012. Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. 267-270.
- Kimberly E Arnold and Niall Sclater. 2017. Student perceptions of their privacy in learning analytics applications. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference. 66-69.
- Onur Asan, Alparslan Emrah Bayrak and Avishek Choudhury. 2020. Artificial Intelligence and Human Trust in Healthcare: Focus on Clinicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, 6, e15154. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15154 · DOI · Paper page
- Sinem Aslan, Nese Alyuz, Cagri Tanriover, Sinem E Mete, Eda Okur, Sidney K D'Mello and Asli Arslan Esme. 2019. Investigating the impact of a real-time, multimodal student engagement analytics technology in authentic classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-12.
- Ryan S. J. D. Baker, Albert T. Corbett, Kenneth R. Koedinger, Shelley Evenson, Ido Roll, Angela Z. Wagner, Meghan Naim, Jay Raspat, Daniel J. Baker and Joseph E. Beck. 2006. Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 392-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11774303_39 · DOI
- Kathy Baxter, Catherine Courage and Kelly Caine. 2015. Understanding Your Users : A Practical Guide to User Research Methods. Elsevier Science & Technology, San Francisco, UNITED STATES.
- Ann Blandford. 2019. HCI for health and wellbeing: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies 131, 41-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.06.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Mark Blythe, Enrique Encinas, Jofish Kaye, Miriam Lueck Avery, Rob McCabe and Kristina Andersen. 2018. Imaginary design workbooks: Constructive criticism and practical provocation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-12.
- Alan Borning and Michael Muller. 2012. Next steps for value sensitive design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1125-1134.
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, 3, 328-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 · DOI · Paper page
- Barry Brown, Alex S Taylor, Shahram Izadi, Abigail Sellen, Joseph Jofish' Kaye and Rachel Eardley. 2007. Locating family values: A field trial of the Whereabouts Clock. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 354-371.
- Christine Buchanan, M Lyndsay Howitt, Rita Wilson, Richard G Booth, Tracie Risling and Megan Bamford. 2021. Predicted influences of artificial intelligence on nursing education: Scoping review. JMIR nursing 4, 1, e23933.
- Carrie J Cai, Samantha Winter, David Steiner, Lauren Wilcox and Michael Terry. 2019. " Hello AI": uncovering the onboarding needs of medical practitioners for human-AI collaborative decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction 3, CSCW, 1-24.
- Ben Carterette. 2011. System effectiveness, user models, and user utility: a conceptual framework for investigation. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 903-912.
- Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan and Wenjie Hu. 2023. Students' voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20, 1, 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Patricia Cline Cohen. 2016. A calculating people: The spread of numeracy in early America. Routledge,
- A. M. Cox. 2021. Exploring the impact of Artificial Intelligence and robots on higher education through literature- based design fictions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 18, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00237-8 · DOI
- Scotty Craig, Arthur Graesser, Jeremiah Sullins and Barry Gholson. 2004. Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of educational media 29, 3, 241-250.
- Sidney D'mello and Art Graesser. 2013. AutoTutor and affective AutoTutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 2, 4, 1-39.
- Thiago Nazareth De Oliveira, Flavia Bernardini and José Viterbo. 2021. An overview on the use of educational data mining for constructing recommendation systems to mitigate retention in higher education. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1-7.
- Rachel Douglas-Jones, Antonia Walford and Nick Seaver. 2021. Introduction: Towards an anthropology of data. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 27, S1, 9-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.13477 · DOI
- Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press,
- Mohamed Ez-Zaouia, Aurélien Tabard and Elise Lavoué. 2020. EMODASH: A dashboard supporting retrospective awareness of emotions in online learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 139, 102411.
- Gloria Milena Fernandez-Nieto, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Vanessa Echeverria, Kirsty Kitto, Dragan Gašević and Simon Buckingham Shum. 2024. Data storytelling editor: A teacher-centred tool for customising learning analytics dashboard narratives. In Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. 678-689.
- Geraldine Fitzpatrick and Gunnar Ellingsen. 2013. A review of 25 years of CSCW research in healthcare: contributions, challenges and future agendas. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22, 609-665.
- Mary Flanagan, Daniel C Howe and Helen Nissenbaum. 2005. Values at play: Design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 751-760.
- Kenneth R Fleischmann, Sherri R Greenberg, Danna Gurari, Abigale Stangl, Nitin Verma, Jaxsen R Day, Rachel N Simons and Tom Yeh. 2019. Good systems: Ethical ai for cscw. In Companion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 461-467.
- Guillaume Fontaine, Sylvie Cossette, Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte, Tanya Mailhot, Marie-France Deschênes, Gabrielle Mathieu-Dupuis, José Côté, Marie-Pierre Gagnon and Veronique Dubé. 2019. Efficacy of adaptive e- learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open 9, 8, e025252.
- Dragan Gasevic, Jelena Jovanovic, Abelardo Pardo and Shane Dawson. 2017. Detecting learning strategies with analytics: Links with self-reported measures and academic performance. Journal of Learning Analytics 4, 2, 113- 128-113-128.
- Laura Hakimi, Rebecca Eynon and Victoria A Murphy. 2021. The Ethics of Using Digital Trace Data in Education: A Thematic Review of the Research Landscape. Review of Educational Research, 00346543211020116.
- Bingyi Han, George Buchanan and Dana Mckay. 2022. Learning in the Panopticon: Examining the Potential Impacts of AI Monitoring on Students. In Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 9- 21.
- Bingyi Han, Sadia Nawaz, George Buchanan and Dana McKay. 2023. Ethical and Pedagogical Impacts of AI in Education. In Springer Nature Switzerland, 667-673.
- Wayne Holmes, Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, Ken Holstein, Emma Sutherland, Toby Baker, Simon Buckingham Shum, Olga C Santos, Mercedes T Rodrigo, Mutlu Cukurova and Ig Ibert Bittencourt. 2021. Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-23.
- Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M McLaren and Vincent Aleven. 2017. SPACLE: Investigating learning across virtual and physical spaces using spatial replays. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference. 358-367.
- Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M. McLaren and Vincent Aleven. 2018. Student Learning Benefits of a Mixed-Reality Teacher Awareness Tool in AI-Enhanced Classrooms. In Springer International Publishing, 154-168.
- Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M. McLaren and Vincent Aleven. 2019. Designing for Complementarity: Teacher and Student Needs for Orchestration Support in AI-Enhanced Classrooms Springer International Publishing, 157-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_14 · DOI · Paper page
- Ming-Tung Hong, Jesse Josua Benjamin and Claudia Müller-Birn. 2018. Coordinating agents: Promoting shared situational awareness in collaborative sensemaking. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 217-220.
- Evey Jiaxin Huang, Daniel Rees Lewis, Shubhanshi Gaudani, Matthew Easterday and Elizabeth Gerber. 2023. Intelligent Coaching Systems: Understanding One-to-many Coaching for Ill-defined Problem Solving. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1, 1-24.
- Stephen Hutt, Kristina Krasich, James R. Brockmole and Sidney K. D'Mello. 2021. Breaking out of the lab: Mitigating mind wandering with gaze-based attention-aware technology in classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-14.
- Seray Ibrahim, Asimina Vasalou and Laura Benton. 2022. Understanding the Situated Practices of School Technology Leaders in the Early Stages of Educational Technology Adoption. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New Orleans, LA, USA, Article 312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502120 · DOI
- Azra Ismail, Divy Thakkar, Neha Madhiwalla and Neha Kumar. 2023. Public Health Calls for/with AI: An Ethnographic Perspective. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, CSCW2, Article 354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3610203 · DOI
- Weijie Jiang and Zachary A Pardos. 2021. Towards equity and algorithmic fairness in student grade prediction. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 608-617.
- Laura P Jiménez-Mijangos, Jorge Rodríguez-Arce, Rigoberto Martínez-Méndez and José Javier Reyes-Lagos. 2023. Advances and challenges in the detection of academic stress and anxiety in the classroom: A literature review and recommendations. Education and Information Technologies 28, 4, 3637-3666.
- Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2006. I just clicked to say I love you: rich evaluations of minimal communication. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Montréal, Québec, Canada, 363-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125530 · DOI
- Pranav Khadpe, Ranjay Krishna, Li Fei-Fei, Jeffrey T Hancock and Michael S Bernstein. 2020. Conceptual metaphors impact perceptions of human-AI collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW2, 1-26.
- DALIA Khairy, RANIA A Abougalala, MARWA F Areed and SAFAA M ATAWY. 2020. Educational robotics based on artificial intelligence and context-awareness technology: a framework [J]. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 98, 1817-3195, 2227-2239.
- Abirami Kirubarajan, Dylan Young, Shawn Khan, Noelle Crasto, Mara Sobel and Dafna Sussman. 2022. Artificial intelligence and surgical education: a systematic scoping review of interventions. Journal of Surgical Education 79, 2, 500-515.
- Priya C Kumar, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L Clegg and Jessica Vitak. 2019. Privacy and security considerations for digital technology use in elementary schools. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-13.
- LuEttaMae Lawrence, Vanessa Echeverria, Kexin Yang, Vincent Aleven and Nikol Rummel. 2024. How teachers conceptualise shared control with an AI co-orchestration tool: A multiyear teacher-centred design process. British Journal of Educational Technology 55, 3, 823-844.
- Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann,
- Hakeoung Hannah Lee and Emma Gargroetzi. 2023. "It's like a double-edged sword": Mentor Perspectives on Ethics and Responsibility in a Learning Analytics-Supported Virtual Mentoring Program. Journal of Learning Analytics 10, 1, 85-100.
- Min Hun Lee, Daniel P Siewiorek, Asim Smailagic, Alexandre Bernardino and Sergi Bermúdez Bermúdez i Badia. 2021. A human-ai collaborative approach for clinical decision making on rehabilitation assessment. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1-14.
- Xiaotian Vivian Li, Mary Beth Rosson and Jenay Robert. 2022. A Scenario-based Exploration of Expected Usefulness, Privacy Concerns, and Adoption Likelihood of Learning Analytics. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. 48-59.
- Phoebe Lin and Jessica Van Brummelen. 2021. Engaging Teachers to Co-Design Integrated AI Curriculum for K-12 Classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Yokohama, Japan, Article 239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445377 · DOI
- Adam Linson, Yucheng Xu, Andrea R English and Robert B Fisher. 2022. Identifying Student Struggle by Analyzing Facial Movement During Asynchronous Video Lecture Viewing: Towards an Automated Tool to Support Instructors. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, 53-65.
- Alex Jiahong Lu, Tawanna R. Dillahunt, Gabriela Marcu and Mark S. Ackerman. 2021. Data Work in Education: Enacting and Negotiating Care and Control in Teachers' Use of Data-Driven Classroom Surveillance Technology. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3479596 · DOI
- Alex Jiahong Lu, Gabriela Marcu, Mark S. Ackerman and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2021. Coding Bias in the Use of Behavior Management Technologies: Uncovering Socio-technical Consequences of Data-driven Surveillance in Classrooms. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. Association for Computing Machinery, Virtual Event, USA, 508-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462084 · DOI
- Qianru Lyu, Wenli Chen, Junzhu Su, Kok Hui John Gerard Heng and Shuai Liu. 2023. How Peers Communicate Without Words-An Exploratory Study of Hand Movements in Collaborative Learning Using Computer-Vision- Based Body Recognition Techniques. In Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer Nature Switzerland, 316-326.
- Mark MacCarthy. 2014. Student privacy: Harm and context. International Review of Information Ethics 21, 11-24.
- Katerina Mangaroska and Michail Giannakos. 2018. Learning analytics for learning design: A systematic literature review of analytics-driven design to enhance learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 12, 4, 516-534.
- Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Andrew Clayphan and Judy Kay. 2015. Deploying and Visualising Teacher's Scripts of Small Group Activities in a Multi-surface Classroom Ecology: a Study in-the-wild. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 24, 2, 177-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9217-6 · DOI
- Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Vanessa Echeverria, Gloria Fernandez-Nieto, Lixiang Yan, Linxuan Zhao, Riordan Alfredo, Xinyu Li, Samantha Dix, Hollie Jaggard and Rosie Wotherspoon. 2023. Lessons learnt from a multimodal learning analytics deployment in-the-wild. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 31, 1, 1-41.
- Dana McKay and Charlynn Miller. 2021. Standing in the way of control: A call to action to prevent abuse through better design of smart technologies. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-14.
- Danielle S McNamara. 2024. AIED: From Cognitive Simulations to Learning Engineering, with Humans in the Middle. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 34, 1, 42-54.
- Danaë Metaxa-Kakavouli, Kelly Wang, James A Landay and Jeff Hancock. 2018. Gender-inclusive design: Sense of belonging and bias in web interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems. 1-6.
- Jakub Mlynar, Farzaneh Bahrami, André Ourednik, Nico Mutzner, Himanshu Verma and Hamed Alavi. 2022. AI beyond Deus ex Machina-Reimagining Intelligence in Future Cities with Urban Experts. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-13.
- Damian Murchan and Fazilat Siddiq. 2021. A call to action: a systematic review of ethical and regulatory issues in using process data in educational assessment. Large-scale Assessments in Education 9, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00115-3 · DOI
- Sungjin Nam and Perry Samson. 2019. Integrating Students' Behavioral Signals and Academic Profiles in Early Warning System Springer International Publishing, 345-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_29 · DOI
- A. Namoun and A. Alshanqiti. 2020. Predicting student performance using data mining and learning analytics techniques: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences 11, 1.
- Sadia Nawaz, Gregor Kennedy, James Bailey, Chris Mead and Lev Horodyskyj. 2018. Struggle town? Developing profiles of student confusion in simulation-based learning environments. In 35th International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE. 224-233.
- Rebecca Nicholson, Tom Bartindale, Ahmed Kharrufa, David Kirk and Caroline Walker-Gleaves. 2022. Participatory Design Goes to School: Co-Teaching as a Form of Co-Design for Educational Technology. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New Orleans, LA, USA, Article 150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517667 · DOI
- Rosemary Papa and Shadow WJ Armfield. 2018. The Wiley handbook of educational policy. John Wiley & Sons,
- Hyanghee Park, Daehwan Ahn, Kartik Hosanagar and Joonhwan Lee. 2022. Designing fair AI in human resource management: Understanding tensions surrounding algorithmic evaluation and envisioning stakeholder-centered solutions. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-22.
- Prasoon Patidar, Tricia J Ngoon, John Zimmerman, Amy Ogan and Yuvraj Agarwal. 2024. ClassID: Enabling Student Behavior Attribution from Ambient Classroom Sensing Systems. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 8, 2, 1-28.
- Yanyi Peng, Masato Kikuchi and Tadachika Ozono. 2023. Development and Experiment of Classroom Engagement Evaluation Mechanism During Real-Time Online Courses. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, 590-601.
- Jenny Preece, Yvonne Rogers and Helen Sharp. 2002. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley, [110
- Mohammad Hosein Rezazade Mehrizi. 2023. Pre-framing an emerging technology before it is deployed at work: the case of artificial intelligence and radiology. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 28, 4, zmad029.
- Samantha Robertson, Tonya Nguyen and Niloufar Salehi. 2021. Modeling assumptions clash with the real world: Transparency, equity, and community challenges for student assignment algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-14.
- Xingran Ruan, Charaka Palansuriya and Aurora Constantin. 2023. Affective Dynamic Based Technique for Facial Emotion Recognition (FER) to Support Intelligent Tutors in Education. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, 774-779.
- Tracii Ryan, Michael Henderson, Kris Ryan and Gregor Kennedy. 2021. Designing learner-centred text-based feedback: a rapid review and qualitative synthesis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46, 6, 894-912.
- Olga C Santos, Milos Kravcik and Jesus G Boticario. 2016. Preface to special issue on user modelling to support personalization in enhanced educational settings. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26, 3, 809-820.
- Laura Scheepmaker, Kay Kender, Christopher Frauenberger and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2021. Leaving the field: Designing a socio-material toolkit for teachers to continue to design technology with children. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-14.
- Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Alex Hanna and Emily Denton. 2021. Do datasets have politics? Disciplinary values in computer vision dataset development. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2, 1-37.
- Daniel Schiff, Justin Biddle, Jason Borenstein and Kelly Laas. 2020. What's next for ai ethics, policy, and governance? a global overview. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 153-158.
- Niall Sclater. 2016. Developing a Code of Practice for Learning Analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics 3, 1, 16-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.3 · DOI
- Neil Selwyn. 2016. Is technology good for education? John Wiley & Sons,
- Lele Sha, Mladen Rakovic, Angel Das, Dragan Gasevic and Guanliang Chen. 2022. Leveraging Class Balancing Techniques to Alleviate Algorithmic Bias for Predictive Tasks in Education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2022.3196278 · DOI · Paper page
- Stephen Snow, Kenneth Radke, Dhaval Vyas and Margot Brereton. 2014. Privacy in the new era of visible and sharable energy-use information. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design. 342-351.
- Marilyn Strathern. 1997. 'Improving ratings': audit in the British University system. European review 5, 3, 305-321.
- Lucy A Suchman. 1987. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge university press,
- Gahyun Sung, Tianyi Feng and Bertrand Schneider. 2021. Learners Learn More and Instructors Track Better with Real-time Gaze Sharing. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3449208 · DOI
- Arnout Terpstra, Alwin De Rooij and Alexander Schouten. 2023. Online Proctoring: Privacy Invasion or Study Alleviation? Discovering Acceptability Using Contextual Integrity. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-20.
- Terrie Lynn Thompson and Paul Prinsloo. 2022. Returning the data gaze in higher education. Learning, Media and Technology, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2092130 · DOI
- Jeffrey W Treem, William C Barley, Matthew S Weber and Joshua B Barbour. 2023. Signaling and meaning in organizational analytics: coping with Goodhart's Law in an era of digitization and datafication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 28, 4, zmad023.
- Giovanni M Troiano, Matthew Wood, Mustafa Feyyaz Sonbudak, Riddhi Chandan Padte and Casper Harteveld. 2021. "Are We Now Post-COVID?": Exploring Post-COVID Futures Through a Gamified Story Completion Method. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 48-63.
- Giovanni Maria Troiano, John Tiab and Youn-Kyung Lim. 2016. SCI-FI: shape-changing interfaces, future interactions. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 1-10.
- Giovanni Maria Troiano, Matthew Wood and Casper Harteveld. 2020. " And This, Kids, Is How I Met Your Mother": Consumerist, Mundane, and Uncanny Futures with Sex Robots. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-17.
- Yi-Shan Tsai, Pedro Manuel Moreno-Marcos, Kairit Tammets, Kaire Kollom and Dragan Gašević. 2018. SHEILA policy framework: informing institutional strategies and policy processes of learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. 320-329.
- Yi-Shan Tsai, Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright and Dragan Gašević. 2020. The privacy paradox and its implications for learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. Association for Computing Machinery, Frankfurt, Germany, 230-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375536 · DOI
- Michael Vierhauser, Clemens Sauerwein, Tobias Antensteiner and Sebastian Hatmanstorfer. 2024. Learning Analytics Support in Higher-Education: Towards a Multi-Level Shared Learning Analytics Framework. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Education.
- Jenny Waycott, Greg Wadley, Stefan Schutt, Arthur Stabolidis and Reeva Lederman. 2015. The Challenge of Technology Research in Sensitive Settings: Case Studies in'ensitive HCI'. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction. 240-249.
- Billy Tak-Ming Wong, Kam Cheong Li and Simon K. S. Cheung. 2022. An analysis of learning analytics in personalised learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09324-3 · DOI
- Richmond Y Wong and Vera Khovanskaya. 2018. Speculative design in HCI: from corporate imaginations to critical orientations. In New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2-Methodologies, Springer, 175- 202.
- Matthew Wood, Gavin Wood and Madeline Balaam. 2017. " They're Just Tixel Pits, Man" Disputing the'Reality'of Virtual Reality Pornography through the Story Completion Method. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5439-5451.
- Lixiang Yan, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Linxuan Zhao, Xinyu Li and Dragan Gašević. 2023. Physiological Synchrony and Arousal as Indicators of Stress and Learning Performance in Embodied Collaborative Learning. In Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer Nature Switzerland, 602-614.
- Kexin Bella Yang, Vanessa Echeverria, Zijing Lu, Hongyu Mao, Kenneth Holstein, Nikol Rummel and Vincent Aleven. 2023. Pair-Up: Prototyping Human-AI Co-orchestration of Dynamic Transitions between Individual and Collaborative Learning in the Classroom. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Hamburg, Germany, Article 453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581398 · DOI · Paper page
- Qiyang Zhang and Amanda Neitzel. 2023. Choosing the right tool for the job: Screening tools for systematic reviews in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1-27.
- Rui Zhang, Nathan J McNeese, Guo Freeman and Geoff Musick. 2021. " An ideal human" expectations of AI teammates in human-AI teaming. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3, 1-25.
- Wei Zhang, Mingxuan Cai, Hong Joo Lee, Richard Evans, Chengyan Zhu and Chenghan Ming. 2024. AI in Medical Education: Global situation, effects and challenges. Education and Information Technologies 29, 4, 4611-4633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12009-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhe Zhang and Ling Xu. 2022. Student engagement with automated feedback on academic writing: a study on Uyghur ethnic minority students in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2102175 · DOI
- Authors
- Han, B., Coghlan, S., Buchanan, G., & McKay, D.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- RMIT University (AU)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
- Published
- 2025-05-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-32
- ISSN
- 2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4410538171
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 10
- FWCI
- 32.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, student perceptions, classroom dynamics, student monitoring, algorithmic bias, power disparities, situated context, ethical AI design, higher education, human-AI collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review