The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Startup Intention to AI-Enabled Digital Execution: Modeling How Students Turn Business Ideas into Early Computational Action
Open accessAbstract
This study examines how students convert AI driven entrepreneurial intention into early action by extending TPB/TAM with digital literacy. Here, “early action” is understood as early digital execution (EDE): whether students are already using AI-enabled computing tools to build, automate, and test parts of a business idea (e.g., generating market validation content with generative AI, automating simple workflows, assembling AI-assisted prototypes). Using a cross sectional survey of Vietnamese undergraduates and PLS-SEM, the study validates reliable constructs and strong model performance. The findings contribute to theory by integrating digital capability into TPB in the AI linked entrepreneurship context, while offering practical implications for universities to prioritize digital skills training, design learning and doing experiences with AI, and activate social and incubation networks to translate intention into action. Beyond theory, the paper proposes concrete computing design rules, pre-configured AI sandboxes, one-click automation starter kits, and short feedback-driven build sprints that operationalize the progression from Digital Literacy (DL), to Behavioral Intention (BI), and ultimately to Early Digital Execution (EA/EDE) as measurable digital execution rather than just aspiration. At a computational level, the study formalizes this mechanism as a structural model BI = f(PU, SN, DL) and EDE = f(BI), and estimates the corresponding path coefficients (β) using PLS-SEM with bootstrapped resampling. The main limitations concern the cross sectional design and sample scope; subsequent research should broaden the context and employ longitudinal tracking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 1×
“…than stopping at a pitch deck, programs should require 7-14 day build sprints that culminate in a one-tap mini proof-of-concept (mini-POC), before/after comparison, or explicit implementation-intentions plan; such structured action planning has been shown to reduce the intention-behavior gap [29].”
A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics
Rahimi, B., Nadri, H., Lotfnezhad Afshar, H., & Timpka, T. (2018) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1668091 · Cited by 688
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.63056/ACAD.004.03.0716 · DOI
- 10.1186/S13731-024-00412-5/TABLES/6 · DOI
- 10.3389/FPSYG.2020.546745/FULL · DOI
- 10.61242/IJABO.23.261 · DOI
- 10.2174/0118749445394456250605043155 · DOI
- 10.2196/14316 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/21582440251378790 · DOI
- “(PDF) The influence of entrepreneurial attitudes, subjective norms and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intentions.” Accessed: Oct. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355897911_The_influence_of_entrepreneurial_attitudes_subjective_norms_and_self-efficacy_on_entrepreneurial_intentions
- 10.36681/tused.2023.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.JIK.2025.100788 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2023.114480 · DOI
- 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/S11747-014-0403-8/FIGURES/8 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_8 · DOI
- “A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) - Joseph F. Hair - Google Books.” Accessed: Oct. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com.vn/books?hl=en&lr=&id=IFiarYXE1PoC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=A+Primer+on+Partial+Least+Squares+Structural+Equation+Modeling+(PLS-SEM)&ots=phNAxX3iSM&sig=cl36X0SxGmvzOglfoe6OHpYMMpI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=series of analyses%2C which Exhibit 7.5 illustrates. The first step addresses the significance of the indirect effect (p1 · p2) via the mediator variable (Y2). If the indirect effect is not significant (right-hand side of Exhibit 7.5)%2C we conclude that Y2 does not function as a mediator in&f=false
- 10.3390/PSYCHOLINT7010013 · DOI
- 10.3390/SU15086907 · DOI
- 10.33122/IJOCE.V4I2.30 · DOI
- J. F. Hair, M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and S. P. Gudergan, “An overview of recent and emerging developments in PLS-SEM,” in Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, Springer, 2018, pp. 1-27.
- 10.1016/J.SSAHO.2024.101178 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.JIK.2025.100788 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2016.03.049 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E41413 · DOI
- 10.1055/S-0038-1668091 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/REV3.3462 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Ta, N. K., & Nguyen, L. T.
- Affiliations
- FPT University (VN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Conference on Information Education and Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2025-12-12
- Pages
- 938-945
- OpenAlex
- W7161284144
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Conference on Information Education and Artificial Intelligence (ICIEAI) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Keywords
- entrepreneurial intention, digital literacy, theory of planned behavior, technology acceptance model, behavioral intention, generative AI, business idea validation, automation, digital skills training, university entrepreneurship, undergraduate students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review