The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes
Abstract
There is a growing need to be able to accurately and efficiently search visual data sets, and in particular, 3D shape data sets. This paper proposes a novel technique, called Topology Matching, in which similarity between polyhedral models is quickly, accurately, and automatically calculated by comparing Multiresolutional Reeb Graphs (MRGs). The MRG thus operates well as a search key for 3D shape data sets. In particular, the MRG represents the skeletal and topological structure of a 3D shape at various levels of resolution. The MRG is constructed using a continuous function on the 3D shape, which may preferably be a function of geodesic distance because this function is invariant to translation and rotation and is also robust against changes in connectivities caused by a mesh simplification or subdivision. The similarity calculation between 3D shapes is processed using a coarse-to-fine strategy while preserving the consistency of the graph structures, which results in establishing a correspondence between the parts of objects. The similarity calculation is fast and efficient because it is not necessary to determine the particular pose of a 3D shape, such as a rotation, in advance. Topology Matching is particularly useful for interactively searching for a 3D object because the results of the search fit human intuition well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F. W., Dutta, D., & Kim, S. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 · Cited by 1,456
Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks
Nagy, M., Ákos, Z., Biro, D., & Vicsek, T. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08891 · Cited by 1,053
Medical image segmentation on GPUs – A comprehensive review
Smistad, E., Falch, T. L., Bozorgi, M., Elster, A. C., & Lindseth, F. (2015) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2014.10.012 · Cited by 264
Retrieving articulated 3-D models using medial surfaces
Siddiqi, K., Zhang, J., Macrini, D., Shokoufandeh, A., Bouix, S., & Dickinson, S. (2008) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00138-007-0097-8 · Cited by 256
Gromov‐Hausdorff Stable Signatures for Shapes using Persistence
Chazal, F., Cohen‐Steiner, D., Guibas, L. J., Mémoli, F., & Oudot, S. Y. (2009) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01516.x · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Hilaga, M., Shinagawa, Y., Kohmura, T., & Kunii, T. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-08
- Pages
- 203-212
- OpenAlex
- W2165939338
- Cited by
- 2,187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 131.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/383259.383282
- The paper
- Hilaga, M., Shinagawa, Y., Kohmura, T., & Kunii, T. L. (2001). Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. https://doi.org/10.1145/383259.383282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.