The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relevance based language models
Abstract
We explore the relation between classical probabilistic models of information retrieval and the emerging language modeling approaches. It has long been recognized that the primary obstacle to effective performance of classical models is the need to estimate arelevance model: probabilities of words in the relevant class. We propose a novel technique for estimating these probabilities using the query alone. We demonstrate that our technique can produce highly accurate relevance models, addressing important notions of synonymy and polysemy. Our experiments show relevance models outperforming baseline language modeling systems on TREC retrieval and TDT tracking tasks. The main contribution of this work is an effective formal method for estimating a relevance model with no training data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A language modeling approach to information retrieval
Ponte, J. M., & Croft, W. B. (1998) · Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/290941.291008 · Cited by 1,821
Self-citation
Cited by
The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond
Robertson, S., & Zaragoza, H. (2009) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000019 · Cited by 3,374
A Survey of Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval
Carpineto, C., & Romano, G. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2071389.2071390 · Cited by 1,109
Interpreting TF-IDF term weights as making relevance decisions
Wu, H. C., Luk, R. W. P., Wong, K. F., & Kwok, K. L. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1361684.1361686 · Cited by 821
Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval
Zhai, C., & Lafferty, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management · doi:10.1145/502585.502654 · Cited by 787
Cluster-based retrieval using language models
Liu, X., & Croft, W. B. (2004) · Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/1008992.1009026 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lavrenko, V., & Croft, W. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-09
- Pages
- 120-127
- OpenAlex
- W4246858749
- Cited by
- 1,037
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relevance based language models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/383952.383972
- The paper
- Lavrenko, V., & Croft, W. B. (2001). Relevance based language models. Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/383952.383972
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.