The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making
Open accessAbstract
Application of computer and communications technology to cooperative work and group decision making has grown out of three traditions: computer-based communications, computer:based information service provision, and computer-based decision support. This paper reviews the group decision support systems (GDSSs) that have been configured to meet the needs of groups at work, and evaluates the experience to date with such systems. Progress with GDSSs has proved to be slower than originally anticipated because of shortcomings with available technology, poor integration of the various components of the computing package, and incomplete understanding of the nature of group decision making. Nevertheless, the field shows considerable promise with respect to the creation of tools to aid in group decision making and the development of sophisticated means of studying the dynamics of decision making in groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
The interdisciplinary study of coordination
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/174666.174668 · Cited by 3,504
Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers
Grudin, J. (1994) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/175222.175230 · Cited by 1,228
Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups
Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.6.689 · Cited by 849
A Critical Analysis of Decision Support Systems Research
Arnott, D., & Pervan, G. (2005) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000035 · Cited by 571
Decision Support Systems: A Historical Overview
Power, D. J. (2008) · International Handbooks on Information Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_7 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Kraemer, K. L., & King, J. L.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-146
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2052876062
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 59.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
