Cited by 202Decision Support System ApplicationsBig Data and Business IntelligenceInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Decision Support Systems: A Historical Overview

Power, Daniel J.·2008·International Handbooks on Information Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_7

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Power, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Northern Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Power, Daniel J.
Venue
International Handbooks on Information Systems
Published
2008
Pages
121-140
ISSN
  • 2627-8510
  • 2627-8529
OpenAlex
W26406251
Cited by
202
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.37
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
decision support system, technology adoption trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review