The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment
Abstract
Clustering is a widely used technique in data mining applications to discover patterns in the underlying data. Most traditional clustering algorithms are limited to handling datasets that contain either continuous or categorical attributes. However, datasets with mixed types of attributes are common in real life data mining problems. In this paper, we propose a distance measure that enables clustering data with both continuous and categorical attributes. This distance measure is derived from a probabilistic model that the distance between two clusters is equivalent to the decrease in log-likelihood function as a result of merging. Calculation of this measure is memory efficient as it depends only on the merging cluster pair and not on all the other clusters. Zhang et al [8] proposed a clustering method named BIRCH that is especially suitable for very large datasets. We develop a clustering algorithm using our distance measure based on the framework of BIRCH. Similar to BIRCH, our algorithm first performs a pre-clustering step by scanning the entire dataset and storing the dense regions of data records in terms of summary statistics. A hierarchical clustering algorithm is then applied to cluster the dense regions. Apart from the ability of handling mixed type of attributes, our algorithm differs from BIRCH in that we add a procedure that enables the algorithm to automatically determine the appropriate number of clusters and a new strategy of assigning cluster membership to noisy data. For data with mixed type of attributes, our experimental results confirm that the algorithm not only generates better quality clusters than the traditional k-means algorithms, but also exhibits good scalability properties and is able to identify the underlying number of clusters in the data correctly. The algorithm is implemented in the commercial data mining tool Clementine 6.0 which supports the PMML standard of data mining model deployment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What do we know about mobile Internet adopters? A cluster analysis
Okazaki, S. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.05.001 · Cited by 260
Survey of State-of-the-Art Mixed Data Clustering Algorithms
Ahmad, A., & Khan, S. S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2903568 · Cited by 253
Are There Executive Dysfunction Subtypes Within ADHD?
Roberts, B. A., Martel, M. M., & Nigg, J. T. (2017) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054713510349 · Cited by 116
Neural Correlates of Three Promising Endophenotypes of Depression: Evidence from the EMBARC Study
Webb, C. A., Dillon, D. G., Pechtel, P., Goer, F. K., Murray, L., Huys, Q. J., Fava, M., McGrath, P. J., Weissman, M., Parsey, R., et al. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.165 · Cited by 103
Configurations of e-HRM-an empirical exploration
Strohmeier, S., & Kabst, R. (2014) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-07-2013-0082 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiu, T., Fang, D., Chen, J., Wang, Y., & Jeris, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-08-26
- Pages
- 263-268
- OpenAlex
- W1999349314
- Cited by
- 724
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/502512.502549
- The paper
- Chiu, T., Fang, D., Chen, J., Wang, Y., & Jeris, C. (2001). A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment. Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/502512.502549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.