Cited by 73Employer Branding and e-HRMHuman Resource and Talent ManagementAI and HR Technologies

Configurations of e-HRM-an empirical exploration

Strohmeier, Stefan, Kabst, Ruediger·2014·Employee Relations

Abstract

Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to investigate types, contexts and consequences of electronic HRM (e-HRM) configurations to get a deeper understanding of the reasons, kinds and success of different e-HRM types. Design/methodology/approach: – The paper uses a cross-sectional survey of senior HR persons and analyses data with exploratory methods, i.e. cluster analysis, classification tree analysis and analysis of variance. Findings: – The results show that actually three configurations of e-HRM – “non users”, “operational users” and “power users” – exist. These can be explained by a sparse, yet meaningful set of contextual variables. All three configurations markedly contribute to organisational success, whereas the “power user”-configuration exceeds the other configurations. Research limitations/implications: – The employed e-HRM typology shows a precursory status and the empirical study is exploratory in nature. Thus, searching for a clearer theoretical foundation, improving the hypothesising of variables and undertaking further empirical studies to replicate the findings are necessary future steps. Practical implications: – Not always a maximum of electronic support seems to be indicated. Depending on the respective organisational context, even no electronic support, or else, a merely operational electronic support appears to be admissible; while, however, in larger and strategic-oriented organisations full electronic support outperforms other configurations. Originality/value: –The paper focuses on different e-HRM types and gives some first insights into reasons, kinds and success of different configurations. This should lead to a refined understanding of e-HRM and evoke further research on the subject.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/er-07-2013-0082

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Power-users e-HRM configuration will have a positive influence on HRM (AI) routinization.

    “Research Proposition 3 (a-d): Power-users e-HRM configuration will have a positive influence on HRM (AI) (a) initiation,(b) adoption, (c) routinization, and (d) extension.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Strohmeier & Kabst, 2014

  • Power-users e-HRM configuration will have a positive influence on HRM (AI) extension.

    “Research Proposition 3 (a-d): Power-users e-HRM configuration will have a positive influence on HRM (AI) (a) initiation,(b) adoption, (c) routinization, and (d) extension.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Strohmeier & Kabst, 2014

  • Power-users e-HRM configuration will have a positive influence on HRM (AI) adoption.

    “Research Proposition 3 (a-d): Power-users e-HRM configuration will have a positive influence on HRM (AI) (a) initiation,(b) adoption, (c) routinization, and (d) extension.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Strohmeier & Kabst, 2014

  • Power-users e-HRM configuration will have a positive influence on HRM (AI) initiation.

    “Research Proposition 3 (a-d): Power-users e-HRM configuration will have a positive influence on HRM (AI) (a) initiation,(b) adoption, (c) routinization, and (d) extension.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Strohmeier & Kabst, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strohmeier, S., & Kabst, R.
Affiliations
Saarland University (DE)
Venue
Employee Relations
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
333-353
ISSN
0142-5455 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109287190
Cited by
73
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Employee Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
Keywords
power users, non-users, HR technology adoption, organizational success, contextual factors, human resource management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review