The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Item-Based Top- N Recommendation Algorithms
Abstract
The explosive growth of the world-wide-web and the emergence of e-commerce has led to the development of recommender systems---a personalized information filtering technology used to identify a set of N items that will be of interest to a certain user. User-based Collaborative filtering is the most successful technology for building recommender systems to date, and is extensively used in many commercial recommender systems. Unfortunately, the computational complexity of these methods grows linearly with the number of customers that in typical commercial applications can grow to be several millions. To address these scalability concerns item-based recommendation techniques have been developed that analyze the user-item matrix to identify relations between the different items, and use these relations to compute the list of recommendations.In this paper we present one such class of item-based recommendation algorithms that first determine the similarities between the various items and then used them to identify the set of items to be recommended. The key steps in this class of algorithms are (i) the method used to compute the similarity between the items, and (ii) the method used to combine these similarities in order to compute the similarity between a basket of items and a candidate recommender item. Our experimental evaluation on five different datasets show that the proposed item-based algorithms are up to 28 times faster than the traditional user-neighborhood based recommender systems and provide recommendations whose quality is up to 27% better.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Self-citationFouss, F., Pirotte, A., Renders, J.-M., & Saerens, M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2007.46 · Cited by 1,265
A Graph-based model for context-aware recommendation using implicit feedback data
Yao, W., He, J., Huang, G., Cao, J., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-014-0307-z · Cited by 54
Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2015) · Synthesis Lectures on Information Security, Privacy, and Trust · doi:10.2200/s00657ed1v01y201507spt013 · Cited by 53
Bayesian Personalized Feature Interaction Selection for Factorization Machines
Chen, Y., Ren, P., Wang, Y., & de Rijke, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3331184.3331196 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Karypis, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-10-05
- Pages
- 247-254
- OpenAlex
- W2128629010
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Item-Based Top- N Recommendation Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/502585.502627
- The paper
- Karypis, G. (2001). Evaluation of Item-Based Top- N Recommendation Algorithms. Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1145/502585.502627
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.