Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 917

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Managing trust in a peer-2-peer information system

Open access
Aberer, Karl, Despotovic, Zoran·2001·Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management

Abstract

Managing trust is a problem of particular importance in peer-to-peer environments where one frequently encounters unknown agents. Existing methods for trust management, that are based on reputation, focus on the semantic properties of the trust model. They do not scale as they either rely on a central database or require to maintain global knowledge at each agent to provide data on earlier interactions. In this paper we present an approach that addresses the problem of reputation-based trust management at both the data management and the semantic level. We employ at both levels scalable data structures and algorithms that require no central control and allow to assess trust by computing an agents reputation from its former interactions with other agents. Thus the meethod can be implemented in a peer-to-peer environment and scales well for very large numbers of participants. We expect that scalable methods for trust management are an important factor, if fully decentralized peer-to-peer systems should become the platform for more serious applications than simple file exchange.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/502585.502638

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. A. Abdul-R&man and S. Hailes: Supporting Trust in Virtual Communities Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 2000 .]] A. Abdul-R&man and S. Hailes: Supporting Trust in Virtual Communities Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000.]]
  2. K. Aberer: P-Grid:A self-organizing access structure for PdP information systems Proc . of the Ninth International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems ( CoopIS 2001 ), 2001 .]] K. Aberer: P-Grid:A self-organizing access structure for PdP information systems Proc. of the Ninth International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS 2001), 2001.]]
  3. E. Adar and B. A. Huberman : Free riding on Gnvtella Technical report , Xerox PARC , 10 Aug. 2000 .]] E. Adar and B. A. Huberman: Free riding on Gnvtella Technical report, Xerox PARC, 10 Aug. 2000.]]
  4. 10.5555/619059.621625 · doi:10.5555/619059.621625
  5. 10.1145/383059.383072 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1145/383059.383071 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bin Yu and Munindar P . Singh: A Social Mechanism of Reputation Management in Electronic Communities Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents , Matthias Klusch, Larry Kerschberg (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science , Vol. 1860 , Springer , 2000 .]] Bin Yu and Munindar P. Singh: A Social Mechanism of Reputation Management in Electronic Communities Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents, Matthias Klusch, Larry Kerschberg (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1860, Springer, 2000.]]

Cited by

See all 917

Metadata

Authors
Aberer, K., & Despotovic, Z.
Venue
Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2001-10-05
Pages
310-317
OpenAlex
W2000368422
Cited by
917
References
0
FWCI
138.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing trust in a peer-2-peer information system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/502585.502638
The paper
Aberer, K., & Despotovic, Z. (2001). Managing trust in a peer-2-peer information system. Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1145/502585.502638

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.