The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean
Abstract
Explosing common misuses of the subsumption relationship and the formal basis for why they are wrong.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WordNet: a lexical database for English
Miller, G. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219717.219748 · Cited by 14,015
Ontological Relativity and Other Essays
Quine, W. V. (1969) · doi:10.7312/quin92204 · Cited by 3,593
Circumscription—A form of non-monotonic reasoning
McCarthy, J. (1980) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(80)90011-9 · Cited by 2,017
Cited by
A survey on aspect-based sentiment classification
Brauwers, G., & Frasincar, F. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3503044 · Cited by 165
Toward spotting the pedophile telling victim from predator in text chats
Pendar, N. (2007) · International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC 2007) · doi:10.1109/icsc.2007.32 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Guarino, N., & Welty, C.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-65
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2097395913
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 46.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
