Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

More than dotting the i's --- foundations for crossing-based interfaces

Accot, Johnny, Zhai, Shumin·2002·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
DOI 10.1145/503376.503390
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Today's graphical interactive systems largely depend upon pointing actions, i.e. entering an object and selecting it. In this paper we explore whether an alternate paradigm --- crossing boundaries --- may substitute or complement pointing as another fundamental interaction method. We describe an experiment in which we systematically evaluate two target-pointing tasks and four goal-crossing tasks, which differ by the direction of the movement variability constraint (collinear vs. orthogonal) and by the nature of the action (pointing vs. crossing, discrete vs. continuous). We found that participants' temporal performance in each of the six tasks was dependent on the index of difficulty formulated in the same way as in Fitts' law, but that the parameters differ by task. We also found that goal crossing completion time was shorter or no longer than pointing performance under the same index of difficulty. These regularities, as well as qualitative characterizations of crossing actions and their application in HCI, lay the foundation for designing crossing-based user interfaces

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/503376.503390

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1145/258549.258760 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1145/192426.192501 · DOI · Paper page
  3. E. R. Hoffmann and I. H. Sheikh . Effect of varying target height in a Fitts' movement task. Ergonomics, 37( 6): 1071--1088 , 1994 . E. R. Hoffmann and I. H. Sheikh. Effect of varying target height in a Fitts' movement task. Ergonomics, 37( 6): 1071--1088, 1994.
  4. 10.1145/263407.263541 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/300520.300522 · DOI
  6. 10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1145/142750.142794 · DOI · Paper page
  8. A. Murata . Extending effective target width in Fitts' law to a two-dimensional pointing task . International journal of human- computer interaction, 11( 2): 137--152 , 1999 . A. Murata. Extending effective target width in Fitts' law to a two-dimensional pointing task. International journal of human- computer interaction, 11( 2): 137--152, 1999.
  9. 10.1145/355324.355328 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/97243.97277 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/191666.191822 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Accot, J., & Zhai, S.
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2002-04-20
Pages
73-80
DOI
10.1145/503376.503390
OpenAlex
W2033288247
Cited by
372
References
1
FWCI
8.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.