The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling software architectures in the Unified Modeling Language
Abstract
The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a family of design notations that is rapidly becoming a de facto standard software design language. UML provides a variety of useful capabilities to the software designer, including multiple, interrelated design views, a semiformal semantics expressed as a UML meta model, and an associated language for expressing formal logic constraints on design elements. The primary goal of this work is an assessment of UML's expressive power for modeling software architectures in the manner in which a number of existing software architecture description languages (ADLs) model architectures. This paper presents two strategies for supporting architectural concerns within UML. One strategy involves using UML "as is," while the other incorporates useful features of existing ADLs as UML extensions. We discuss the applicability, strengths, and weaknesses of the two strategies. The strategies are applied on three ADLs that, as a whole, represent a broad cross-section of present-day ADL capabilities. One conclusion of our work is that UML currently lacks support for capturing and exploiting certain architectural concerns whose importance has been demonstrated through the research and practice of software architectures. In particular, UML lacks direct support for modeling and exploiting architectural styles, explicit software connectors, and local and global architectural constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system
Lamport, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359545.359563 · Cited by 8,488
A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages
Medvidovic, N., & Taylor, R. N. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.825767 · Cited by 1,987
Cited by
The Palladio component model for model-driven performance prediction
Becker, S., Koziolek, H., & Reussner, R. (2009) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2008.03.066 · Cited by 657
What Industry Needs from Architectural Languages: A Survey
Malavolta, I., Lago, P., Muccini, H., Pelliccione, P., & Tang, A. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2012.74 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Medvidovic, N., Rosenblum, D. S., Redmiles, D. F., & Robbins, J. E.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-57
- ISSN
- 1049-331X (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7392
- OpenAlex
- W2092431575
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 109.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling software architectures in the Unified Modeling Language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/504087.504088
- The paper
- Medvidovic, N., Rosenblum, D. S., Redmiles, D. F., & Robbins, J. E. (2002). Modeling software architectures in the Unified Modeling Language. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1145/504087.504088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.