The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Shape distributions
Abstract
Measuring the similarity between 3D shapes is a fundamental problem, with applications in computer graphics, computer vision, molecular biology, and a variety of other fields. A challenging aspect of this problem is to find a suitable shape signature that can be constructed and compared quickly, while still discriminating between similar and dissimilar shapes.In this paper, we propose and analyze a method for computing shape signatures for arbitrary (possibly degenerate) 3D polygonal models. The key idea is to represent the signature of an object as a shape distribution sampled from a shape function measuring global geometric properties of an object. The primary motivation for this approach is to reduce the shape matching problem to the comparison of probability distributions, which is simpler than traditional shape matching methods that require pose registration, feature correspondence, or model fitting.We find that the dissimilarities between sampled distributions of simple shape functions (e.g., the distance between two random points on a surface) provide a robust method for discriminating between classes of objects (e.g., cars versus airplanes) in a moderately sized database, despite the presence of arbitrary translations, rotations, scales, mirrors, tessellations, simplifications, and model degeneracies. They can be evaluated quickly, and thus the proposed method could be applied as a pre-classifier in a complete shape-based retrieval or analysis system concerned with finding similar whole objects. The paper describes our early experiences using shape distributions for object classification and for interactive web-based retrieval of 3D models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geodesic Convolutional Neural Networks on Riemannian Manifolds
Masci, J., Boscaini, D., Bronstein, M. M., & Vandergheynst, P. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW) · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2015.112 · Cited by 721
Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., Kimmel, R., Mahmoudi, M., & Sapiro, G. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0301-6 · Cited by 267
Retrieving articulated 3-D models using medial surfaces
Siddiqi, K., Zhang, J., Macrini, D., Shokoufandeh, A., Bouix, S., & Dickinson, S. (2008) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00138-007-0097-8 · Cited by 256
Gromov‐Hausdorff Stable Signatures for Shapes using Persistence
Chazal, F., Cohen‐Steiner, D., Guibas, L. J., Mémoli, F., & Oudot, S. Y. (2009) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01516.x · Cited by 225
Robust principal axes determination for point-based shapes using least median of squares
Liu, Y.-S., & Ramani, K. (2009) · Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1016/j.cad.2008.10.012 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Osada, R., Funkhouser, T., Chazelle, B., & Dobkin, D.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 807-832
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2295332248
- Cited by
- 1,661
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shape distributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/571647.571648
- The paper
- Osada, R., Funkhouser, T., Chazelle, B., & Dobkin, D. (2002). Shape distributions. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/571647.571648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.