Cited by 2673D Shape Modeling and AnalysisTopological and Geometric Data AnalysisGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows

A Gromov-Hausdorff Framework with Diffusion Geometry for Topologically-Robust Non-rigid Shape Matching

Open access
Bronstein, Alexander M., Bronstein, Michael M., Kimmel, Ron, Mahmoudi, Mona, Sapiro, Guillermo·2010·International Journal of Computer Vision

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11263-009-0301-6

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In cases with large topological changes, the isometry assumption may fail [38]; handling such issues is a challenging task.

    “In cases with large topological changes, the isometry assumption may fail [38]; handling such issues is a challenging task.”
  • Recent intrinsic techniques [36], [38], [39] use low dimensional embedding to by-pass the high-dimensionality problem by assuming a strong inelastic isometry constraint.

    “Recent intrinsic techniques [36], [38], [39] use low dimensional embedding to by-pass the high-dimensionality problem by assuming a strong inelastic isometry constraint.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. S. Lafon, Diffusion Maps and Geometric Harmonics, Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University (2004).
  2. F. Memoli, G. Sapiro, and P. Thompson, Geometric surface and brain warping via geodesic minimizing Lipschitz extensions, MFCA-2006 International Workshop on Mathematical Foundations of Computational Anatomy, Copenhagen, October 2006.
  3. R. M. Rustamov, Laplce-beltrami eigenfunctions for deformation invariant shape repre- sentation, Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing (2007).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., Kimmel, R., Mahmoudi, M., & Sapiro, G.
Affiliations
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Sapiro, Guillermo
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
2009-10-08
Volume
89
Issue
2-3
Pages
266-286
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W1982465050
Cited by
267
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 31
FWCI
25.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
  • University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Keywords
non-rigid shape matching, shape recognition, diffusion distance, Gromov-Hausdorff distance, metric geometry, topological robustness, geodesic distance, non-rigid deformation, missing data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review