The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Software engineering economics: background, current practices, and future directions
Abstract
The field of software economics seeks to develop technical theories, guidelines, and practices of software development based on sound, established, and emerging models of value and value-creation---adapted to the domain of software development as necessary. The premise of the field is that software development is an ongoing investment activity---in which developers and managers continually make investment decisions requiring the expenditure of valuable resources, such as time, talent, and money. The overriding aim of this activity is to maximize the value added subject to an equitable distribution among the participating stakeholders. The goal of the tutorial is to expose the audience to this line of thinking and introduce the tools pertinent to its pursuit. The tutorial is designed to be self-contained and will cover concepts from introductory to advanced. Both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the impact of value considerations in software decision-making will benefit from attending it.This tutorial is offered in conjunction with the Fourth International Workshop on Economics-Driven Software Engineering Research (EDSER-4). The tutorial is meant in part to enable those who would like to participate in the workshop, but who might not possess the requisite background, to come up to speed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams
Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072 · Cited by 1,689
Effects of Process Maturity on Quality, Cycle Time, and Effort in Software Product Development
Harter, D. E., Krishnan, M. S., & Slaughter, S. A. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.4.451.12056 · Cited by 507
Team Familiarity, Role Experience, and Performance: Evidence from Indian Software Services
Huckman, R. S., Staats, B. R., & Upton, D. M. (2009) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0921 · Cited by 470
Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development
Espinosa, J. A., Slaughter, S. A., Kraut, R. E., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0297 · Cited by 420
Clarke, P., & O’Connor, R. V. (2012) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.12.003 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Erdogmus, H., Boehm, B. W., Harrison, W., Reifer, D. J., & Sullivan, K. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Software engineering - ICSE '02
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2002
- ISSN
- 0270-5257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2551072204
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Software engineering economics: background, current practices, and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/581441.581444
- The paper
- Erdogmus, H., Boehm, B. W., Harrison, W., Reifer, D. J., & Sullivan, K. J. (2002). Software engineering economics: background, current practices, and future directions. Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Software engineering - ICSE '02. https://doi.org/10.1145/581441.581444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.