The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constructing attack scenarios through correlation of intrusion alerts
Abstract
Traditional intrusion detection systems (IDSs) focus on low-level attacks or anomalies, and raise alerts independently, though there may be logical connections between them. In situations where there are intensive attacks, not only will actual alerts be mixed with false alerts, but the amount of alerts will also become unmanageable. As a result, it is difficult for human users or intrusion response systems to understand the alerts and take appropriate actions. This paper presents a practical technique to address this issue. The proposed approach constructs attack scenarios by correlating alerts on the basis of prerequisites and consequences of attacks. Intuitively, the prerequisite of an attack is the necessary condition for the attack to be successful, while the consequence of an attack is the possible outcome of the attack. Based on the prerequisites and consequences of different types of attacks, our method correlates alerts by (partially) matching the consequences of some prior alerts with the prerequisites of some later ones. Moreover, to handle large collections of alerts, this paper presents three interactive analysis utilities aimed at reducing the complexity of the constructed attack scenarios without losing the structure of the attacks. This paper also reports the experiments conducted to validate the proposed techniques
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2005) · doi:10.1007/0-387-28356-0 · Cited by 853
A Multidimensional Critical State Analysis for Detecting Intrusions in SCADA Systems
Carcano, A., Coletta, A., Guglielmi, M., Masera, M., Nai Fovino, I., & Trombetta, A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2010.2099234 · Cited by 259
An unsupervised anomaly-based detection approach for integrity attacks on SCADA systems
Almalawi, A., Yu, X., Tari, Z., Fahad, A., & Khalil, I. (2014) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2014.07.005 · Cited by 113
Hierarchical, model-based risk management of critical infrastructures
Baiardi, F., Telmon, C., & Sgandurra, D. (2009) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2009.02.001 · Cited by 43
Building Evidence Graphs for Network Forensics Analysis
Wang, W., & Daniels, T. E. (2006) · 21st Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC'05) · doi:10.1109/csac.2005.14 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Ning, P., Cui, Y., & Reeves, D. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2002-11-18
- Pages
- 245-254
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141200504
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constructing attack scenarios through correlation of intrusion alerts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/586110.586144
- The paper
- Ning, P., Cui, Y., & Reeves, D. S. (2002). Constructing attack scenarios through correlation of intrusion alerts. Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/586110.586144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.