The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphics and managerial decision making: research-based guidelines
Open accessAbstract
Graphical charts are generally thought to be a superior reporting technique compared to more traditional tabular representations in organizational decision making. The experimental literature, however, demonstrates only partial support for this hypothesis. To identify the characteristics of the situations that have been shown to benefit from the use of graphics, existing studies are reviewed in terms of the type of task used, the format employed, and the user experience. The examination of the literature reveals a set of empirically based—though preliminary—guidelines as to when and how to use business graphics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Relative Merits of Circles and Bars for Representing Component Parts
Eells, W. C. (1926) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1926.10502165 · Cited by 108
Bar Charts versus Circle Diagrams
Croxton, F. E., & Stryker, R. E. (1927) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1927.10502976 · Cited by 81
Cited by
Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature*
Vessey, I. (1991) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00344.x · Cited by 1,263
Making Sense of Graphs: Critical Factors Influencing Comprehension and Instructional Implications
Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749671 · Cited by 819
Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition
Vessey, I., & Galletta, D. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.1.63 · Cited by 705
Huysmans, J., Dejaeger, K., Mues, C., Vanthienen, J., & Baesens, B. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.003 · Cited by 425
A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and research
Yigitbasioglu, O. M., & Velcu, O. (2012) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2011.08.002 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Dickson, G. W.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1988-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 764-774
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2040656330
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
