The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-cultural user-interface design: what? so what? now what?
Abstract
CHI and other conferences recognize the importance of considering cross-cultural (including gender) communication issues in user-interface (UI) design. Classic texts about cultures are not sufficiently known in the SIGCHI community. Many consumer information appliances, or computer-based communication products, must be suitable for international, multi-cultural markets. The growth of and consequent immediate international access to the Web demand a response by UI designers to the issues of when and how user interfaces can be designed for global access yet account for local differences. Attendees will discuss with mentors challenges of designing UIs for international and/or multi-cultural use, in which metaphors, mental models, navigation, interaction, and/or appearance must be significantly adjusted to account for global and/or local needs. Issues to be discussed include the following:• What are the dimensions of culture? What research exists?• What are the differences among cultures, e.g., North American, European, Asian? How do they affect UIs?• How does we account for different references of icons, metaphors, organization, and navigation strategies?• Can we design locale-neutral user interfaces? What can/must be standardized or localized?• How can/should cultural diversity issues impact professional education?• Why do/don't businesses design for global markets?• How can we handle legal issues across cultures in the borderless Internet?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design
Marcus, A., & Gould, E. W. (2000) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/345190.345238 · Cited by 654
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wurtz, E. (2005) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00313.x · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcus, A., Aykin, N., Chavan, A. L., Day, D. L., Gould, E. W., Honold, P., & Kurosu, M.
- Venue
- CHI '00 extended abstracts on Human factors in computer systems - CHI '00
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2000
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review