The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formative design evaluation of superbook
Open accessAbstract
SuperBook is a hypertext browsing system designed to improve the usability of conventional documents. Successive versions of SuperBook were evaluated in a series of behavioral studies. Students searched for information in a statistics text. presented either in conventional printed form or in SuperBook form. The best version of SuperBook enabled students to answer search questions more quickly and accurately than they could with the conventional text. Students wrote higher quality “open-book” essays using SuperBook than they did with the conventional text, and their subjective ratings of the documentation strongly favored SuperBook. This work is a case study of formative design-evaluation. Behavioral evaluation of the first version of SuperBook showed how design factors and user strategies affected search and established baseline performance measures with printed text. The second version of SuperBook was implemented with the goal of improving search accuracy and speed. User strategies that had proved effective in the first study were made very easy and attractive to use. System response time for common operations was greatly improved. Behavioral evaluation of the new SuperBook demonstrated its superiority to printed text and suggested additional improvements that were incorporated into “MiteyBook,” a SuperBook implementation for PC-size screens. Search with MiteyBook proved to be approximately 25 percent faster and 25 percent more accurate than that obtained with a conventional printed book.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Indexing by latent semantic analysis
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::aid-asi1>3.0.co;2-9 · Cited by 12,751
Self-citationDesigning the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction
(1993) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(93)90471-k · Cited by 5,587
Bush, V. (1945) · Cited by 2,998
Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey
Conklin (1987) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.1987.1663693 · Cited by 2,718
Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction
(1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-12113-x · Cited by 2,058
Furnas, G. W. (1986) · ACM SIGCHI Bulletin · doi:10.1145/22339.22342 · Cited by 1,629
Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction
Briggs, J. S. (1987) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/0950-5849(87)90040-1 · Cited by 1,146
Furnas, G. W. (1986) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/22627.22342 · Cited by 890
A research center for augmenting human intellect
Engelbart, D. C., & English, W. K. (1968) · Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I on - AFIPS '68 (Fall, part I) · doi:10.1145/1476589.1476645 · Cited by 659
Using latent semantic analysis to improve access to textual information
Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Deerwester, S., & Harshman, R. (1988) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '88 · doi:10.1145/57167.57214 · Cited by 616
Self-citation
Cited by
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations
Shneiderman, B. (2002) · Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages · doi:10.1109/vl.1996.545307 · Cited by 4,535
Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm
White, R. W., & Roth, R. A. (2009) · Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services · doi:10.2200/s00174ed1v01y200901icr003 · Cited by 632
TileBars: visualization of term distribution information in full text information access
Hearst, M. A. (1995) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223904.223912 · Cited by 555
The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations
Shneiderman, B. (2003) · The Craft of Information Visualization · doi:10.1016/b978-155860915-0/50046-9 · Cited by 515
Metadata
- Authors
- Egan, D. E., Remde, J. R., Gomez, L. M., Landauer, T. K., Eberhardt, J., & Lochbaum, C. C.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Published
- 1989-01-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-57
- ISSN
- 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2868
- OpenAlex
- W2022335546
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 21.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formative design evaluation of superbook. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/64789.64790
- The paper
- Egan, D. E., Remde, J. R., Gomez, L. M., Landauer, T. K., Eberhardt, J., & Lochbaum, C. C. (1989). Formative design evaluation of superbook. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/64789.64790
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.