The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A unifying framework for detecting outliers and change points from non-stationary time series data
Abstract
We are concerned with the issues of outlier detection and change point detection from a data stream. In the area of data mining, there have been increased interest in these issues since the former is related to fraud detection, rare event discovery, etc., while the latter is related to event/trend by change detection, activity monitoring, etc. Specifically, it is important to consider the situation where the data source is non-stationary, since the nature of data source may change over time in real applications. Although in most previous work outlier detection and change point detection have not been related explicitly, this paper presents a unifying framework for dealing with both of them on the basis of the theory of on-line learning of non-stationary time series. In this framework a probabilistic model of the data source is incrementally learned using an on-line discounting learning algorithm, which can track the changing data source adaptively by forgetting the effect of past data gradually. Then the score for any given data is calculated to measure its deviation from the learned model, with a higher score indicating a high possibility of being an outlier. Further change points in a data stream are detected by applying this scoring method into a time series of moving averaged losses for prediction using the learned model. Specifically we develop an efficient algorithms for on-line discounting learning of auto-regression models from time series data, and demonstrate the validity of our framework through simulation and experimental applications to stock market data analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A View of the Em Algorithm that Justifies Incremental, Sparse, and other Variants
Neal, R. M., & Hinton, G. E. (1998) · Learning in Graphical Models · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9_12 · Cited by 2,187
Cited by
A review on time series data mining
Fu, T.-C. (2011) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2010.09.007 · Cited by 1,500
A survey of methods for time series change point detection
Aminikhanghahi, S., & Cook, D. J. (2017) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-016-0987-z · Cited by 1,237
Change-point detection in time-series data by relative density-ratio estimation
Liu, S., Yamada, M., Collier, N., & Sugiyama, M. (2013) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2013.01.012 · Cited by 447
Incremental Local Outlier Detection for Data Streams
Pokrajac, D., Lazarevic, A., & Latecki, L. J. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining · doi:10.1109/cidm.2007.368917 · Cited by 386
Ding, Z., & Fei, M. (2013) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.3182/20130902-3-cn-3020.00044 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamanishi, K., & Takeuchi, J.-I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2002-07-23
- Pages
- 676-681
- OpenAlex
- W2046868034
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A unifying framework for detecting outliers and change points from non-stationary time series data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/775047.775148
- The paper
- Yamanishi, K., & Takeuchi, J.-I. (2002). A unifying framework for detecting outliers and change points from non-stationary time series data. Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/775047.775148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.