The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incremental Local Outlier Detection for Data Streams
Abstract
Outlier detection has recently become an important problem in many industrial and financial applications. This problem is further complicated by the fact that in many cases, outliers have to be detected from data streams that arrive at an enormous pace. In this paper, an incremental LOF (local outlier factor) algorithm, appropriate for detecting outliers in data streams, is proposed. The proposed incremental LOF algorithm provides equivalent detection performance as the iterated static LOF algorithm (applied after insertion of each data record), while requiring significantly less computational time. In addition, the incremental LOF algorithm also dynamically updates the profiles of data points. This is a very important property, since data profiles may change over time. The paper provides theoretical evidence that insertion of a new data point as well as deletion of an old data point influence only limited number of their closest neighbors and thus the number of updates per such insertion/deletion does not depend on the total number of points TV in the data set. Our experiments performed on several simulated and real life data sets have demonstrated that the proposed incremental LOF algorithm is computationally efficient, while at the same time very successful in detecting outliers and changes of distributional behavior in various data stream applications
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335388 · Cited by 5,207
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/342009.335388 · Cited by 4,149
A Geometric Framework for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection: Detecting Intrusions in Unlabeled Data
Eskin, E., Arnold, A., Prerau, M., Portnoy, L., & Stolfo, S. (2002) · Advances in Information Security · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0953-0_4 · Cited by 683
Cited by
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Pimentel, M. A. F., Clifton, D. A., Clifton, L., & Tarassenko, L. (2014) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026 · Cited by 1,649
Trajectory-Based Anomalous Event Detection
Piciarelli, C., Micheloni, C., & Foresti, G. L. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2008.2005599 · Cited by 532
Outlier Detection: Methods, Models, and Classification
Boukerche, A., Zheng, L., & Alfandi, O. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3381028 · Cited by 334
A decomposition of the outlier detection problem into a set of supervised learning problems
Paulheim, H., & Meusel, R. (2015) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-015-5507-y · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Pokrajac, D., Lazarevic, A., & Latecki, L. J.
- Venue
- 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 504-515
- OpenAlex
- W2144200194
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incremental Local Outlier Detection for Data Streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cidm.2007.368917
- The paper
- Pokrajac, D., Lazarevic, A., & Latecki, L. J. (2007). Incremental Local Outlier Detection for Data Streams. 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1109/cidm.2007.368917
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.