The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AEGIS: architecture for tamper-evident and tamper-resistant processing
Abstract
We describe the architecture for a single-chip aegis processor which can be used to build computing systems secure against both physical and software attacks. Our architecture assumes that all components external to the processor, such as memory, are untrusted. We show two different implementations. In the first case, the core functionality of the operating system is trusted and implemented in a security kernel. We also describe a variant implementation assuming an untrusted operating system.aegis provides users with tamper-evident, authenticated environments in which any physical or software tampering by an adversary is guaranteed to be detected, and private and authenticated tamper-resistant environments where additionally the adversary is unable to obtain any information about software or data by tampering with, or otherwise observing, system operation. aegis enables many applications, such as commercial grid computing, secure mobile agents, software licensing, and digital rights management.Preliminary simulation results indicate that the overhead of security mechanisms in aegis is reasonable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359340.359342 · Cited by 13,462
Cited by
Security and privacy challenges in industrial internet of things
Sadeghi, A.-R., Wachsmann, C., & Waidner, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference · doi:10.1145/2744769.2747942 · Cited by 916
Demystifying Arm TrustZone: A Comprehensive Survey
Pinto, S., & Santos, N. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3291047 · Cited by 505
Security in embedded systems: Design challenges
Ravi, S., Raghunathan, A., Kocher, P., & Hattangady, S. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1015047.1015049 · Cited by 463
Using ARM trustzone to build a trusted language runtime for mobile applications
Santos, N., Raj, H., Saroiu, S., & Wolman, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems · doi:10.1145/2541940.2541949 · Cited by 192
A Formal Foundation for Secure Remote Execution of Enclaves
Subramanyan, P., Sinha, R., Lebedev, I., Devadas, S., & Seshia, S. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134098 · Cited by 119
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Suh, G. E., Clarke, D., Gassend, B., van Dijk, M., & Devadas, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 17th annual international conference on Supercomputing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2003-06-23
- Pages
- 160-171
- OpenAlex
- W4206314719
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AEGIS: architecture for tamper-evident and tamper-resistant processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/782814.782838
- The paper
- Suh, G. E., Clarke, D., Gassend, B., van Dijk, M., & Devadas, S. (2003). AEGIS: architecture for tamper-evident and tamper-resistant processing. Proceedings of the 17th annual international conference on Supercomputing. https://doi.org/10.1145/782814.782838
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.