The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Countering code-injection attacks with instruction-set randomization
Open accessAbstract
We describe a new, general approach for safeguarding systems against any type of code-injection attack. We apply Kerckhoff's principle, by creating process-specific randomized instruction sets (e.g., machine instructions) of the system executing potentially vulnerable software. An attacker who does not know the key to the randomization algorithm will inject code that is invalid for that randomized processor, causing a runtime exception. To determine the difficulty of integrating support for the proposed mechanism in the operating system, we modified the Linux kernel, the GNU binutils tools, and the bochs-x86 emulator. Although the performance penalty is significant, our prototype demonstrates the feasibility of the approach, and should be directly usable on a suitable-modified processor (e.g., the Transmeta Crusoe).Our approach is equally applicable against code-injecting attacks in scripting and interpreted languages, e.g., web-based SQL injection. We demonstrate this by modifying the Perl interpreter to permit randomized script execution. The performance penalty in this case is minimal. Where our proposed approach is feasible (i.e., in an emulated environment, in the presence of programmable or specialized hardware, or in interpreted languages), it can serve as a low-overhead protection mechanism, and can easily complement other mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
AMNESIA: analysis and monitoring for NEutralizing SQL-injection attacks
Halfond, W. G. J., & Orso, A. (2005) · Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/1101908.1101935 · Cited by 527
Vigilante: end-to-end containment of internet worms
Costa, M., Crowcroft, J., Castro, M., Rowstron, A., Zhou, L., Zhang, L., & Barham, P. (2005) · ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review · doi:10.1145/1095809.1095824 · Cited by 441
Robotics cyber security: vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and recommendations
Yaacoub, J.-P. A., Noura, H. N., Salman, O., & Chehab, A. (2022) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-021-00545-8 · Cited by 320
“• Malicious code injection (MCI) attacks or Remote Code Execution (RCE) attacks are based on an attacker’s capability of executing malicious codes in order to perform an injection attack [166].”
DIVERSIFY: Ecology-inspired software evolution for diversity emergence
Baudry, B., Monperrus, M., Mony, C., Chauvel, F., Fleurey, F., & Clarke, S. (2014) · 2014 Software Evolution Week - IEEE Conference on Software Maintenance, Reengineering, and Reverse Engineering (CSMR-WCRE) · doi:10.1109/csmr-wcre.2014.6747203 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Kc, G. S., Keromytis, A. D., & Prevelakis, V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2003-10-27
- Pages
- 272-280
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101699859
- Cited by
- 646
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Countering code-injection attacks with instruction-set randomization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/948109.948146
- The paper
- Kc, G. S., Keromytis, A. D., & Prevelakis, V. (2003). Countering code-injection attacks with instruction-set randomization. Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/948109.948146
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.