The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Timing-sync protocol for sensor networks
Abstract
Wireless ad-hoc sensor networks have emerged as an interesting and important research area in the last few years. The applications envisioned for such networks require collaborative execution of a distributed task amongst a large set of sensor nodes. This is realized by exchanging messages that are time-stamped using the local clocks on the nodes. Therefore, time synchronization becomes an indispensable piece of infrastructure in such systems. For years, protocols such as NTP have kept the clocks of networked systems in perfect synchrony. However, this new class of networks has a large density of nodes and very limited energy resource at every node; this leads to scalability requirements while limiting the resources that can be used to achieve them. A new approach to time synchronization is needed for sensor networks.In this paper, we present Timing-sync Protocol for Sensor Networks (TPSN) that aims at providing network-wide time synchronization in a sensor network. The algorithm works in two steps. In the first step, a hierarchical structure is established in the network and then a pair wise synchronization is performed along the edges of this structure to establish a global timescale throughout the network. Eventually all nodes in the network synchronize their clocks to a reference node. We implement our algorithm on Berkeley motes and show that it can synchronize a pair of neighboring motes to an average accuracy of less than 20ms. We argue that TPSN roughly gives a 2x better performance as compared to Reference Broadcast Synchronization (RBS) and verify this by implementing RBS on motes. We also show the performance of TPSN over small multihop networks of motes and use simulations to verify its accuracy over large-scale networks. We show that the synchronization accuracy does not degrade significantly with the increase in number of nodes being deployed, making TPSN completely scalable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Review of Data Fusion Techniques
Castanedo, F. (2013) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2013/704504 · Cited by 1,027
Clock synchronization for wireless sensor networks: a survey
Sundararaman, B., Buy, U., & Kshemkalyani, A. D. (2005) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2005.01.002 · Cited by 988
Time synchronization in sensor networks: a survey
Sivrikaya, F., & Yener, B. (2004) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2004.1316761 · Cited by 851
Blockchain-based secure time protection scheme in IoT
Fan, K., Wang, S., Ren, Y., Yang, K., Yan, Z., Li, H., & Yang, Y. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2874222 · Cited by 78
Precise synchronization time stamp generation for Bluetooth low energy
Rheinlander, C. C., & Wehn, N. (2016) · 2016 IEEE SENSORS · doi:10.1109/icsens.2016.7808812 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganeriwal, S., Kumar, R., & Srivastava, M. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2003-11-05
- Pages
- 138-149
- OpenAlex
- W2105666891
- Cited by
- 2,051
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing-sync protocol for sensor networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/958491.958508
- The paper
- Ganeriwal, S., Kumar, R., & Srivastava, M. B. (2003). Timing-sync protocol for sensor networks. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/958491.958508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.