Cited by 1,027Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksInertial Sensor and NavigationAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

A Review of Data Fusion Techniques

Open access
Castanedo, Federico·2013·The Scientific World Journal

Abstract

The integration of data and knowledge from several sources is known as data fusion. This paper summarizes the state of the data fusion field and describes the most relevant studies. We first enumerate and explain different classification schemes for data fusion. Then, the most common algorithms are reviewed. These methods and algorithms are presented using three different categories: (i) data association, (ii) state estimation, and (iii) decision fusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2013/704504

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data fusion is the mechanism by which disparate data sources are merged to create an information state based on the sources' complementarity.

    “Data fusion is underpinned by information theory and is the mechanism by which disparate data sources are merged to create an information state based on the sources’ complementarity15,16 (Box 1).”

    From Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction defines data fusion as combining multiple sources to obtain improved information. Section 2.1 identifies complementary sources as one case, but also describes fusion of redundant and cooperative sources; the paper does not make complementarity the basis of data fusion generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The advantages of data fusion can be categorized as complementary, redundant and cooperative features, though these are not mutually exclusive.

    “More specifically, the advantages of data fusion can be categorized as complementary, redundant and cooperative features [4, 5], though these are not mutually exclusive.”

    From Multimodal deep learning for biomedical data fusion: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    Section 2.1 (page unavailable) classifies relations between data sources as complementary, redundant, or cooperative, and describes the benefit of each. It does not explicitly say these three categories are nonexclusive; the paper's explicit “nonexclusive” statement in the Introduction refers to a different classification. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [8]Durrant-Whyte HF Stevens M Data fusion in decentralized sensing networks Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Fusion 2001 Montreal, Canada 302 307
  2. [12]Shindler M Wong A Meyerson A Fast and accurate κ-means for large datasets Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS '11) December 2011 2375 2383 2-s2.0-84860635976
  3. [21]Coraluppi S Carthel C Luettgen M Lynch S All-source track and identity fusion Proceedings of the National Symposium on Sensor and Data Fusion 2000
  4. [26]Chong Y Mori S Chang KC Information lusion in distributed sensor networks Proceedings of the 4th American Control Conference June 1985 Boston, Mass, USA
  5. [36]Welch Bishop G An Introduction to the Kalman Filter 2001 ACM SIC-CRAPH, 2001 Course Notes

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castanedo, F.
Affiliations
Universidad de Deusto (ES)
Corresponding author
Castanedo, Federico
Venue
The Scientific World Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01
Volume
2013
Issue
1
Pages
704504-704504
ISSN
  • 1537-744X (ISSN-L)
  • 2356-6140
OpenAlex
W2133297572
Cited by
1,027
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 11
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Scientific World JOURNAL (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
data fusion, data association, state estimation, decision fusion, sensor data integration, classification systems
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Electronic Data Processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review