The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Software project risks and their effect on outcomes
Abstract
How to identify the risks that interact to pose the most significant threats to successful project outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clarke, P., & O’Connor, R. V. (2012) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.12.003 · Cited by 332
Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence
de Bakker, K., Boonstra, A., & Wortmann, H. (2010) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.07.002 · Cited by 332
Plaza, M., & Rohlf, K. (2008) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.005 · Cited by 65
Users as knowledge co-producers in the information system development project
Hsu, J. S.-C., Lin, T.-C., Zheng, G.-T., & Hung, Y.-W. (2012) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.008 · Cited by 34
Caniglia, A., Dentamaro, V., Galantucci, S., & Impedovo, D. (2025) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107605 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallace, L., & Keil, M.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 68-73
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2029141425
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Software project risks and their effect on outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/975817.975819
- The paper
- Wallace, L., & Keil, M. (2004). Software project risks and their effect on outcomes. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/975817.975819
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
