CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Users as knowledge co-producers in the information system development project

Hsu, Jack Shih-Chieh, Lin, Tung-Ching, Zheng, Guang-Ting, Hung, Yu-Wen·2012·International Journal of Project Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.008

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Barki, 2001, An integrative contingency model of software project risk management, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 37, 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045666 · DOI
  2. Bassellier, 2004, Business competence of information technology professionals: conceptual development and influence on IT-business partnerships, MIS Quarterly, 28, 673, 10.2307/25148659 · DOI
  3. Bassellier, 2001, Information technology competence of business managers: a definition and research model, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 159, 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045660 · DOI
  4. Bassellier, 2003, The influence of business managers' IT competence on championing IT, Information Systems Research, 14, 317, 10.1287/isre.14.4.317.24899 · DOI
  5. Bettencourt, 2002, Client co-production in knowledge-intensive business services, California Management Review, 44, 100, 10.2307/41166145 · DOI
  6. Boehm, 2003, Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods, Computer, 36, 57, 10.1109/MC.2003.1204376 · DOI
  7. Carlile, 2004, Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries, Organization Science, 15, 555, 10.1287/orsc.1040.0094 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Carte, 2003, In pursuit of moderation: nine common errors and their solutions, MIS Quarterly, 27, 479, 10.2307/30036541 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Doherty, 2001, An investigation of the factors affecting the successful treatment of organisational issues in systems development projects, European Journal of Information Systems, 10, 147, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000401 · DOI
  10. Gemino, 2007, A temporal model of information technology project performance, Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 9, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240301 · DOI
  11. Granovetter, 1973, The strength of weak ties, The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360, 10.1086/225469 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Grant, 1996, Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109, 10.1002/smj.4250171110 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Guinan, 1998, Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: a behavioral versus technical approach, Information Systems Research, 9, 101, 10.1287/isre.9.2.101 · DOI
  14. He, 2008, The role of user participation in information systems development: implications from a meta-analysis, Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 301, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250111 · DOI
  15. Henderson, 1992, Managing I/S design teams: a control theories perspective, Management Science, 38, 757, 10.1287/mnsc.38.6.757 · DOI
  16. Hsu, 2008, The impacts of user review on software responsiveness: moderating requirements uncertainty, Information Management, 45, 203, 10.1016/j.im.2008.01.006 · DOI
  17. Hunton, 1997, Effects of user participation in systems development: a longitudinal field experiment, MIS Quarterly, 21, 359, 10.2307/249719 · DOI
  18. Iacovou, 2009, Selective status reporting in information systems projects: a dyadic-level investigation, MIS Quarterly, 33, 785, 10.2307/20650327 · DOI
  19. Ives, 1984, User involvement and MIS success: a review of research, Management Science, 30, 586, 10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Jiang, 2001, The materiality of information system planning maturity to project performance, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2, 1, 10.17705/1jais.00017 · DOI
  21. Jones, 1996, IS project team performance: an empirical assessment, Information Management, 31, 57, 10.1016/S0378-7206(96)01068-3 · DOI
  22. Kale, 2000, Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 217, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  23. Liang, 2007, Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management, MIS Quarterly, 31, 59, 10.2307/25148781 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Markus, 2004, Participation in development and implementation — updating an old, tired concept for today's IS contexts, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5, 514, 10.17705/1jais.00057 · DOI
  25. Martinsuo, 2009, Knowledge integration between the change program and the parent organisation, International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 3, 241, 10.1504/IJKMS.2009.028839 · DOI
  26. McKeen, 1994, The relationship between user participation and user satisfaction: an investigation of four contingency factors, MIS Quarterly, 18, 427, 10.2307/249523 · DOI
  27. Mitchell, 2006, Knowledge creation in groups: the value of cognitive diversity, transactive memory and open-mindedness norms, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4, 67
  28. Mohammed, 2001, Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 89, 10.1002/job.86 · DOI
  29. Newell, 2004, Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: the importance of bridging and bonding, British Journal of Management, 15, 43, 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00399.x · DOI
  30. Nidumolu, 1995, The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: residual performance risk as an intervening variable, Information Systems Research, 6, 191, 10.1287/isre.6.3.191 · DOI
  31. Nissen, 2005, Knowledge as a multidimensional concept: a call for action, International Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, i
  32. Patnayakuni, 2007, Systems development process improvement: a knowledge integration perspective, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54, 286, 10.1109/TEM.2007.893997 · DOI
  33. Payne, 2008, Managing the co-creation of value, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 83, 10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Preston, 2009, Antecedents of IS strategic alignment: a nomological network, Information Systems Research, 20, 159, 10.1287/isre.1070.0159 · DOI
  35. Procaccino, 2009, Software developers' views of end-users and project success, Communications of the ACM, 52, 113, 10.1145/1506409.1506437 · DOI
  36. Ramasubbu, 2008, Work dispersion, process-based learning, and offshore software development performance, MIS Quarterly, 32, 437, 10.2307/25148847 · DOI
  37. Ravichandran, 2000, Quality management in systems development: an organizational system perspective, MIS Quarterly, 24, 381, 10.2307/3250967 · DOI
  38. Rizzo, 1970, Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150, 10.2307/2391486 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Robert, 2008, Social capital and knowledge integration in digitally enabled teams, Information Systems Research, 19, 314, 10.1287/isre.1080.0177 · DOI
  40. Robillard, 1999, The role of knowledge in software development, Communications of the ACM, 42, 87, 10.1145/291469.291476 · DOI
  41. Ross, 1998, Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets, IEEE Engineering Management Review, 26, 37
  42. Stuart, 2004, Toward an integrative approach to designing service experiences: lessons learned from the theatre, Journal of Operations Management, 22, 609
  43. Szulanski, 1996, Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27, 10.1002/smj.4250171105 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Tait, 1988, The effect of user involvement on system success: a contingency approach, MIS Quarterly, 12, 91, 10.2307/248809 · DOI
  45. Tesch, 2009, User and developer common knowledge: effect on the success of information system development projects, International Journal of Project Management, 27, 657, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.01.002 · DOI
  46. Tiwana, 2005, Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development, Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 13, 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045836 · DOI
  47. Wallace, 2004, Software projects risks and their effect on outcomes, Communications of the ACM, 47, 68, 10.1145/975817.975819 · DOI
  48. Williams, 2003, Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research, Journal of Management, 29, 903, 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00084-9 · DOI
  49. Yetton, 2000, A model of information systems development project performance, Information Systems Journal, 10, 263, 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2000.00088.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hsu, J. S.-C., Lin, T.-C., Zheng, G.-T., & Hung, Y.-W.
Affiliations
National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lin, Tung-Ching
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Project Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
27-36
ISSN
0263-7863 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.008
OpenAlex
W1984173332
Cited by
34
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7
FWCI
11.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
International Journal of Project Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Sun Yat-sen University
  • Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
user participation, knowledge co-production, information system development, common knowledge, requirements analysis, project performance, requirements engineering, design phase, developmental stages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review