Cited by 896

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation

Eckert, Penelope·2012·Annual Review of Anthropology

Abstract

The treatment of social meaning in sociolinguistic variation has come in three waves of analytic practice. The first wave of variation studies established broad correlations between linguistic variables and the macrosociological categories of socioeconomic class, gender, ethnicity, and age. The second wave employed ethnographic methods to explore the local categories and configurations that inhabit, or constitute, these broader categories. In both waves, variation was seen as marking social categories. This article sets out a theoretical foundation for the third wave, arguing that (a) variation constitutes a robust social semiotic system, potentially expressing the full range of social concerns in a given community; (b) the meanings of variables are underspecified, gaining more specific meanings in the context of styles, and (c) variation does not simply reflect, but also constructs, social meaning and hence is a force in social change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0 · DOI
  2. 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38 · DOI
  3. Agha A, 2007, Language and Social Relations
  4. Benor S, 2001, Penn Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV 29, 1
  5. 10.3406/arss.1975.3417 · DOI
  6. Bucholtz M, 1996, Gender and Belief Systems, 119
  7. 10.1111/1467-9481.00090 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/CBO9780511975776 · DOI
  9. 10.1215/00031283-2007-002 · DOI
  10. Cedergren H. 1973. The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. PhD thesis. Cornell Univ., Ling. Dep. 324 pp.
  11. Cheshire J, 1982, Variation in an English Dialect
  12. 10.1111/1467-9481.00089 · DOI
  13. Dubois JW, 2002, Stance and consequence
  14. Eckert P, 1980, Researching American Culture, 139
  15. Eckert P, 1989, Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School
  16. 10.1017/S095439450000017X · DOI
  17. Eckert P, 1997, Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 151
  18. Eckert P, 2000, Linguistic Variation as Social Practice
  19. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1075/silv.7.02eck · DOI
  21. Edwards W, 1985, Polish-American English in Hamtramck: a sociolinguistic study
  22. 10.1017/S0047404500015050 · DOI
  23. Gal S, 1979, Language Shift: Social Determinants of Linguistic Change in Bilingual Austria
  24. Gal S, 2000, Regimes of Language, 35
  25. Gauchat L, 1905, Aus Romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen: Festschrift Heinrich Morf, 175
  26. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hebdige D, 1984, Subculture: The Meaning of Style
  28. 10.1177/0308275X9301300203 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/S004740450001112X · DOI
  30. Irvine J, 2001, Stylistic Variation in Language, 21
  31. 10.1215/00031283-2009-013 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00512.x · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0075424206290692 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00351.x · DOI
  35. 10.1111/1467-9481.00031 · DOI
  36. 10.1525/jlin.2001.11.1.101 · DOI
  37. 10.1075/eww.26.1.02kie · DOI
  38. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008 · DOI
  39. Knack R, 1991, New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change, 252
  40. 10.1017/S0047404500005315 · DOI
  41. Labov W, 1963, Word, 18, 1
  42. Labov W, 1966, The Social Stratification of English in New York City
  43. Labov W, 1972, Language in the Inner City
  44. 10.1017/S0047404500006576 · DOI
  45. Labov W, 1972, Language in the Inner City, 201
  46. Labov W, 2001, Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors
  47. Macaulay RKS, 1977, Language, Social Class and Education: A Glasgow Study
  48. 10.1080/00141844.1996.9981527 · DOI
  49. Milroy L, 1980, Language and Social Networks
  50. Modaressi Y. 1978. A sociolinguistic analysis of modern Persian . PhD thesis. Univ. Kansas. 257 pp.
  51. 10.1353/cjl.2006.0006 · DOI
  52. 10.1017/S0047404509990224 · DOI
  53. Ohala J, 1994, Sound Symbolism, 325
  54. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.x · DOI
  55. Podesva RJ, 2002, Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, 175
  56. 10.1515/9783110871913 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/0271-5309(86)90024-8 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01479-6 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 · DOI
  60. 10.1017/S0047404500000488 · DOI
  61. Trudgill P, 1974, The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich
  62. Wolfram W, 1969, A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech
  63. 10.1017/S0047404505050281 · DOI
  64. 10.1017/S0047404505050153 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00362.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Eckert, P.
Affiliations
Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2150;
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2012-10-21
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
87-100
ISSN
  • 0084-6570
  • 1545-4290
Cited by
896
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review