The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation
Abstract
The treatment of social meaning in sociolinguistic variation has come in three waves of analytic practice. The first wave of variation studies established broad correlations between linguistic variables and the macrosociological categories of socioeconomic class, gender, ethnicity, and age. The second wave employed ethnographic methods to explore the local categories and configurations that inhabit, or constitute, these broader categories. In both waves, variation was seen as marking social categories. This article sets out a theoretical foundation for the third wave, arguing that (a) variation constitutes a robust social semiotic system, potentially expressing the full range of social concerns in a given community; (b) the meanings of variables are underspecified, gaining more specific meanings in the context of styles, and (c) variation does not simply reflect, but also constructs, social meaning and hence is a force in social change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They are perhaps the best example of stylistic choice that speakers make in order to place themselves in the social landscape, which is the focus of much third wave variationist research (Eckert, 2012).”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Eckert, 2012
Citations
Cites
Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445605054407 · Cited by 3,797
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0 · DOI
- 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38 · DOI
- Agha A, 2007, Language and Social Relations
- Benor S, 2001, Penn Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected Papers from NWAV 29, 1
- 10.3406/arss.1975.3417 · DOI
- Bucholtz M, 1996, Gender and Belief Systems, 119
- 10.1111/1467-9481.00090 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511975776 · DOI
- 10.1215/00031283-2007-002 · DOI
- Cedergren H. 1973. The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. PhD thesis. Cornell Univ., Ling. Dep. 324 pp.
- Cheshire J, 1982, Variation in an English Dialect
- 10.1111/1467-9481.00089 · DOI
- Dubois JW, 2002, Stance and consequence
- Eckert P, 1980, Researching American Culture, 139
- Eckert P, 1989, Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School
- 10.1017/S095439450000017X · DOI
- Eckert P, 1997, Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 151
- Eckert P, 2000, Linguistic Variation as Social Practice
- 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1075/silv.7.02eck · DOI
- Edwards W, 1985, Polish-American English in Hamtramck: a sociolinguistic study
- 10.1017/S0047404500015050 · DOI
- Gal S, 1979, Language Shift: Social Determinants of Linguistic Change in Bilingual Austria
- Gal S, 2000, Regimes of Language, 35
- Gauchat L, 1905, Aus Romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen: Festschrift Heinrich Morf, 175
- 10.1017/CBO9780511611834 · DOI · Paper page
- Hebdige D, 1984, Subculture: The Meaning of Style
- 10.1177/0308275X9301300203 · DOI
- 10.1017/S004740450001112X · DOI
- Irvine J, 2001, Stylistic Variation in Language, 21
- 10.1215/00031283-2009-013 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00512.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0075424206290692 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00351.x · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9481.00031 · DOI
- 10.1525/jlin.2001.11.1.101 · DOI
- 10.1075/eww.26.1.02kie · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008 · DOI
- Knack R, 1991, New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change, 252
- 10.1017/S0047404500005315 · DOI
- Labov W, 1963, Word, 18, 1
- Labov W, 1966, The Social Stratification of English in New York City
- Labov W, 1972, Language in the Inner City
- 10.1017/S0047404500006576 · DOI
- Labov W, 1972, Language in the Inner City, 201
- Labov W, 2001, Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors
- Macaulay RKS, 1977, Language, Social Class and Education: A Glasgow Study
- 10.1080/00141844.1996.9981527 · DOI
- Milroy L, 1980, Language and Social Networks
- Modaressi Y. 1978. A sociolinguistic analysis of modern Persian . PhD thesis. Univ. Kansas. 257 pp.
- 10.1353/cjl.2006.0006 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0047404509990224 · DOI
- Ohala J, 1994, Sound Symbolism, 325
- 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.x · DOI
- Podesva RJ, 2002, Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, 175
- 10.1515/9783110871913 · DOI
- 10.1016/0271-5309(86)90024-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01479-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0047404500000488 · DOI
- Trudgill P, 1974, The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich
- Wolfram W, 1969, A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech
- 10.1017/S0047404505050281 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0047404505050153 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00362.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable
Hunt, M., Cotter, C., Pearson, H., & Stockall, L. (2023) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12588 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Eckert, P.
- Affiliations
- Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2150;
- Venue
- Annual Review of Anthropology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-10-21
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-100
- ISSN
- 0084-6570
- 1545-4290
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review