Cited by 94Digital Media and PhilosophyAnthropological Studies and InsightsCybernetics and Technology in Society

The Political Economy of Attention

Pedersen, Morten Axel, Albris, Kristoffer, Seaver, Nick·2021·Annual Review of Anthropology

Abstract

Attention has become an issue of intense political, economic, and moral concern over recent years: from the commodification of attention by digital platforms to the alleged loss of the attentional capacities of screen-addicted children (and their parents). While attention has rarely been an explicit focus of anthropological inquiry, it has still played an important if mostly tacit part in many anthropological debates and subfields. Focusing on anthropological scholarship on digital worlds and ritual forms, we review resources for colleagues interested in this burgeoning topic of research and identify potential avenues for an incipient anthropology of attention, which studies how attentional technologies and techniques mold human minds and bodies in more or less intentional ways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110356

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pedersen, M. A., Albris, K., & Seaver, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Tufts University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2021-10-21
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
309-325
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
OpenAlex
W3190410712
Cited by
94
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
attention, commodification of attention, digital platforms, screen addiction, children, attentional capacity, ritual, digital world, mind-body problem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review