Cited by 722Astrophysics and Star Formation StudiesAstro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Planet-Disk Interaction and Orbital Evolution

Open access
Kley, W., Nelson, R.P.·2012·Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract

As planets form and grow within gaseous protoplanetary disks, the mutual gravitational interaction between the disk and planet leads to the exchange of angular momentum and migration of the planet. We review current understanding of disk-planet interactions, focusing in particular on physical processes that determine the speed and direction of migration. We describe the evolution of low-mass planets embedded in protoplanetary disks and examine the influence of Lindblad and corotation torques as a function of the disk properties. The role of the disk in causing the evolution of eccentricities and inclinations is also discussed. We describe the rapid migration of intermediate-mass planets that may occur as a runaway process and examine the transition to gap formation and slower migration driven by the viscous evolution of the disk for massive planets. The roles and influence of disk self-gravity and magnetohydrodynamic turbulence are discussed in detail, as a function of the planet mass, as is the evolution of multiple planet systems. Finally, we address the question of how well global models of planetary formation that include migration are able to match observations of extrasolar planets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125523

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combined, core accretion and orbital migration form the general framework for planet formation, both within our solar system and within extrasolar planetary systems.

    “Combined, core accretion and orbital migration form the general framework for planet formation, both within our solar system and within extrasolar planetary systems (Kley and Nelson, 2012).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Kley and Nelson, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kley, W., & Nelson, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Venue
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2012-09-22
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
211-249
ISSN
  • 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4282
OpenAlex
W2107656875
Cited by
722
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/F002823/1, ST/J001546/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
planet-disk interaction, planet migration, protoplanetary disks, angular momentum exchange, Lindblad torque, corotation torque, orbital eccentricity evolution, gap formation, disk self-gravity, magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, multi-planet systems, exoplanets, planet formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review