Cited by 119Machine Learning in HealthcareMachine Learning in BioinformaticsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Learning in Biomedical Data Science

Baldi, Pierre·2018·Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science

Abstract

Since the 1980s, deep learning and biomedical data have been coevolving and feeding each other. The breadth, complexity, and rapidly expanding size of biomedical data have stimulated the development of novel deep learning methods, and application of these methods to biomedical data have led to scientific discoveries and practical solutions. This overview provides technical and historical pointers to the field, and surveys current applications of deep learning to biomedical data organized around five subareas, roughly of increasing spatial scale: chemoinformatics, proteomics, genomics and transcriptomics, biomedical imaging, and health care. The black box problem of deep learning methods is also briefly discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013343

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 143 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Srivastava N, 2014, J. Mach. Learning Res., 15, 1929
  2. Duvenaud DK, 2015, Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 28th, Montreal, Can., 7–12 Dec, 2224
  3. Chmiela S, 2017, Müller K-R, 3, e1603015
  4. Baldi P, 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst., 17, 28
  5. Baldi P, 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 4, 575
  6. Fariselli P, 2000, Proc. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol., 8th, La Jolla, Calif., 16–23 Aug, 146
  7. Gorodkin J, 1999, Proc. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol., 7th, Heidelberg, Ger., 6–10 Aug, 95
  8. Fariselli P, 2002, FEBS J, 269, 1356
  9. Golden J, 1995, Proc. Annu. Conf. Evol. Progr., 4th, San Diego, Calif., 1–3 March, 579
  10. Cireşan DC, 2012, Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 25th, Lake Tahoe, Calif., 3–6 Dec, 2843
  11. 131. Wang D, Khosla A, Gargeya R, Irshad H, Beck AH. 2016. Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer. arXiv:1606.05718 [q-bio.QM] · arXiv
  12. Sadowski P, 2015, Proc. Mach. Learn. Res., 42, 81
  13. Stollenga M, 2015, Proc. Int. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 28th, Montreal, Can., 7–12 Dec, 2998
  14. 145. Rajpurkar P, Hannun AY, Haghpanahi M, Bourn C, Ng AY. 2017. Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection with convolutional neural networks. arXiv:1707.01836 [cs.CV] · arXiv
  15. Choi E, 2016, Proc. Mach. Learn. Res., 56, 301
  16. Sherrington CS, 1951, Man on His Nature

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baldi, P.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Baldi, Pierre
Venue
Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science
Published
2018-07-20
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
181-205
ISSN
2574-3414 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799441468
Cited by
119
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
deep learning, biomedical data, cheminformatics, proteomics, genomics, transcriptomics, biomedical imaging, health care, black box problem, history of deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review