Cited by 52Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomarkers for Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Open access
Ganesan, Shridar, Mehnert, Janice·2020·Annual Review of Cancer Biology

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has significant clinical activity in diverse cancer classes and can induce durable remissions in even refractory advanced disease. However, only a minority of cancer patients treated with ICB have long-term benefits, and ICB treatment is associated with significant, potentially life-threatening, autoimmune side effects. There is a great need to develop biomarkers of response to guide patient selection to maximize the chance of benefit and prevent unnecessary toxicity, and current biomarkers do not have optimal positive or negative predictive value. A variety of potential biomarkers are currently being developed, including those based on assessment of checkpoint protein expression, evaluation of tumor-intrinsic features including mutation burden and viral infection, evaluation of features of the tumor immune microenvironment including nature of immune cell infiltration, and features of the host such as composition of the gut microbiome. Better understanding of the underlying fundamental mechanisms of immune response and resistance to ICB, along with the use of complementary assays that interrogate distinct features of the tumor, the tumor microenvironment, and host immune system, will allow more precise use of these therapies to optimize patient outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030419-033604

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 129 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Behr DS, 2014, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol., 7, 7610
  2. Erber R, 2017, Anticancer Res, 37, 6771
  3. Loi S, 2019, Cancer Res, 79, P3
  4. Middha S, 2019, JCO Precis. Oncol., 3
  5. Middha S, 2017, JCO Precis. Oncol., 1
  6. Panda A, 2017, JCO Precis. Oncol., 1
  7. Surace M, 2019, J. Vis. Exp., 143, e58390

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
Ganesan, S., & Mehnert, J.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Cancer Biology
Published
2020-03-09
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
331-351
ISSN
2472-3428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2994573450
Cited by
51
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annual Review of Cancer Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
immune checkpoint blockade, predictive biomarkers, treatment response, immune-related adverse events, patient selection, tumor immune microenvironment, immune cell infiltration, gut microbiota, tumor mutational burden, viral infection, immune resistance mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review