Cited by 290Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current Issues in the Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, and Conduct Disorder

Open access
Frick, Paul J., Nigg, Joel T.·2012·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This review evaluates the diagnostic criteria for three of the most common disorders for which children and adolescents are referred for mental health treatment: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and conduct disorder (CD). Although research supports the validity and clinical utility of these disorders, several issues are highlighted that could enhance the current diagnostic criteria. For ADHD, defining the core features of the disorder and its fit with other disorders, enhancing the validity of the criteria through the lifespan, considering alternative ways to form subtypes of the disorder, and modifying the age-of-onset criterion are discussed relative to the current diagnostic criteria. For ODD, eliminating the exclusionary criteria of CD, recognizing important symptom domains within the disorder, and using the cross-situational pervasiveness of the disorder as an index of severity are highlighted as important issues for improving classification. Finally, for CD, enhancing the current subtypes related to age of onset and integrating callous-unemotional traits into the diagnostic criteria are identified as key issues for improving classification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143150

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 144 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Achenbach TM, 2011, Adult Behavior Checklist
  2. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc. (APA), 2010, Justification for Temper Dysregulation Disorder with Dsyphoria
  3. Boden JM, 2010, J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 49, 1125
  4. Burke JD, 2010, J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 49, 484
  5. Burke JD, 2011, Externalizing Disorders of Childhood: Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V
  6. Frick PJ, 2011, Advances in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology. Volume I: Disruptive Behavior Disorders
  7. Hare RD, 2006, Handbook of Psychopathy, 58
  8. Moffitt TE, 2006, Developmental Psychopathology, Volume 3: Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation, 570
  9. Patrick CJ, 2006, Handbook of Psychopathy, 605
  10. Tremblay RE, 2003, Causes of Conduct Disorder and Delinquency, 182
  11. Willcutt EG, Nigg JT, Rohde LA, Tannock R, Solanto M, et al. 2011. Meta-analysis of DSM-IV ADHD dimensions and subtypes.J. Abnorm. Psychol.In press Comprehensive review and meta-analysis of research regarding validity of DSM-IV dimensions and subtypes.
  12. Youngstrom E, 2011, Secondary Data Analyses Testing the Use of Pervasiveness as a Severity Index

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–290 of 290

Metadata

Authors
Frick, P. J., & Nigg, J. T.
Affiliations
  • LSU New Orleans (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2012-04-27
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
77-107
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2162731592
Cited by
290
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH059105)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, diagnostic criteria, DSM-5, psychiatric classification, age of onset, callous-unemotional traits, comorbidities, symptom domains, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Conduct Disorder, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review