Cited by 94Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesStress Responses and CortisolAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Allostasis, action and affect in depression: Insights from the theory of constructed emotion

Open access
Shaffer, Clare, Westlin, Christiana, Quigley, Karen S., Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan, Barrett, Lisa Feldman·2022·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The theory of constructed emotion is a systems neuroscience approach to understanding the nature of emotion. It is also a general theoretical framework to guide hypothesis generation for how actions and experiences are constructed as the brain continually anticipates metabolic needs and attempts to meet those needs before they arise (termed allostasis). In this review, we introduce this framework and hypothesize that allostatic dysregulation is a trans-disorder vulnerability for mental and physical illness. We then review published findings consistent with the hypothesis that several symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD), such as fatigue, distress, context insensitivity, reward insensitivity, and motor retardation, are associated with persistent problems in energy regulation. Our approach transforms the current understanding of MDD as resulting from enhanced emotional reactivity combined with reduced cognitive control and, in doing so, offers novel hypotheses regarding the development, progression, treatment, and prevention of MDD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-115627

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Precision signals tune the different incoming predictions and prediction errors through engagement of the salience network.

    “Therefore, precision signals (the third principle) tune the different incoming predictions and prediction errors through engagement of the salience network.[113][114][115]”

    From A new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [113]

    In Hypothesis 3, the paper says precision signals modulate both prediction signals and prediction errors. In “Interoception Gives Rise to Affect,” it hypothesizes that the salience network modulates which prediction errors are learned. It does not establish that the salience network tunes predictions as well, and presents the network’s role as a hypothesis rather than a settled mechanism. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findings related to cortisol, commonly framed as markers of emotion dysregulation, would be reframed by the theory of constructed emotion as representing inefficient energy management.

    “While these findings, particularly those related to the 'stress hormone' cortisol, are commonly framed as markers of 'emotion dysregulation'-the theory of constructed emotion would reframe this as representing inefficient energy management.113”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 161 · Cited by 94

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Clore GL, Clore GL, Ortony A. 2008. Appraisal theories: how cognition shapes affect into emotion. In Handbook of Emotions, ed. Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Barrett LF, pp. 628– 42. New York: Guilford. 3rd ed.
  2. Frijda NH. 1986. The Emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  3. Gendron M, Mesquita B, Barrett LF. 2020. The brain as a cultural artifact. In Culture, Mind, and Brain: Emerging Concepts, Models, and Applications, ed. Kirmayer LJ, Worthman CM, Kitayama S, Lemelson R, Cummings CA, pp. 188– 222. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press

Authors
Shaffer, C., Westlin, C., Quigley, K. S., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., & Barrett, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;,
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2022-05-09
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
553-580
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W4229457271
Cited by
94
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R56AG058745)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH113234, R01MH109464)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA193632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
allostasis, theory of constructed emotion, major depressive disorder, energy regulation, fatigue, motor retardation, emotional reactivity, cognitive control
MeSH terms
Brain, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Emotions, Humans, Allostasis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review