Cited by 167Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder

Open access
Jungilligens, Johannes, Paredes-Echeverri, Sara, Popkirov, Stoyan, Barrett, Lisa Feldman, Perez, David L·2022·Brain

Abstract

Functional neurological disorder reflects impairments in brain networks leading to distressing motor, sensory and/or cognitive symptoms that demonstrate positive clinical signs on examination incongruent with other conditions. A central issue in historical and contemporary formulations of functional neurological disorder has been the mechanistic and aetiological role of emotions. However, the debate has mostly omitted fundamental questions about the nature of emotions in the first place. In this perspective article, we first outline a set of relevant working principles of the brain (e.g. allostasis, predictive processing, interoception and affect), followed by a focused review of the theory of constructed emotion to introduce a new understanding of what emotions are. Building on this theoretical framework, we formulate how altered emotion category construction can be an integral component of the pathophysiology of functional neurological disorder and related functional somatic symptoms. In doing so, we address several themes for the functional neurological disorder field including: (i) how energy regulation and the process of emotion category construction relate to symptom generation, including revisiting alexithymia, 'panic attack without panic', dissociation, insecure attachment and the influential role of life experiences; (ii) re-interpret select neurobiological research findings in functional neurological disorder cohorts through the lens of the theory of constructed emotion to illustrate its potential mechanistic relevance; and (iii) discuss therapeutic implications. While we continue to support that functional neurological disorder is mechanistically and aetiologically heterogenous, consideration of how the theory of constructed emotion relates to the generation and maintenance of functional neurological and functional somatic symptoms offers an integrated viewpoint that cuts across neurology, psychiatry, psychology and cognitive-affective neuroscience.

Verified 2026-10-11 · 3 references not checked yet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awac204

Cites

237 of 240 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

110 of 200 cited sources checked · 38 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The notion that discrete emotion categories can be reliably identified by specific behavioural patterns and/or physiological features has been seriously called into doubt by marked variability within instances of the same category as well as similarities across categories.

    “The notion that discrete emotion categories can be reliably identified by specific behavioural patterns and/or physiological features has been seriously called into doubt by the marked variability within instances of the same category as well as similarities across categories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim8 of 10 sources checked
    • cites [52] Durán, 2021, Do emotions result in their predicted facial expressions? A meta-analysis of studies on the link between expression and emotion, Emotion source

      The Confidence in the Findings section reports heterogeneity within some emotion categories, and Moving Beyond rejects the assumption that basic emotions uniformly produce their predicted facial expressions. Implications for Research also reports other reviews’ findings that classic emotions lack distinct autonomic fingerprints. But this paper does not establish the claimed similarities across categories; it notes that systematic information about unpredicted facial movements is lacking. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [53] Gendron, 2018, Universality reconsidered: Diversity in making meaning of facial expressions, Curr Dir Psychol Sci source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [54] Gendron, 2020, Emotion perception in Hadza hunter-gatherers, Sci Rep source
    • cites [55] Le Mau, 2021, Professional actors demonstrate variability, not stereotypical expressions, when portraying emotional states in photographs, Nat Commun source

      The Introduction and Discussion report substantial variation in facial movements within emotion categories and similarities across categories, calling into question whether facial expressions reliably identify discrete emotions. The study examined actors’ facial poses in photographs; it does not establish the same point for physiological features or behavioural patterns beyond facial expressions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [56] Srinivasan, 2021, Cross-cultural and cultural-specific production and perception of facial expressions of emotion in the wild, IEEE Trans Affect Comput source

      Section 2.6.2 reports multiple facial configurations for the same emotion and widely varying agreement on category labels, supporting the concern about variability in behavioural patterns. The paper also finds substantial cross-cultural consistency in identifying emotion categories; these passages do not establish the claimed similarities across categories or address physiological features. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [57] Barrett, 2019, Emotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements, Psychol Sci Public Interest source
    • cites [34] Siegel, 2018, Emotion fingerprints or emotion populations? A meta-analytic investigation of autonomic features of emotion categories, Psychol Bull source
    • cites [60] Hoemann, 2020, Context-aware experience sampling reveals the scale of variation in affective experience, Sci Rep source
    • cites [61] Khalaf, 2020, Analysis of multimodal physiological signals within and between individuals to predict psychological challenge vs. threat, Expert Syst Appl source
    • cites [62] Stemmler, 2007, Anger and fear: Separable effects of emotion and motivational direction on somatovisceral responses, Int J Psychophysiol source
  • Premisecitation

    Accumulating cognitive-affective neuroscience evidence from almost every domain of measurement is strongly inconsistent with the classical view of emotion and its implications.

    “However, accumulating cognitive-affective neuroscience evidence from almost every domain of measurement is strongly inconsistent with this classical view of emotion and its implications (Barrett and Lida, submitted for publication).[47][48][49][50][51]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 6 sources checked
    • cites Barrett and Lida, submitted for publication

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [47] Mobbs, 2019, Viewpoints: Approaches to defining and investigating fear, Nat Neurosci source

      In Q5 (LFB; page unavailable), Barrett challenges simple, dedicated fear circuits and argues that observed actions and physiological changes should not themselves be treated as fear. This supports the narrower point that some evidence and interpretations challenge a classical view. The paper does not establish the claim’s breadth—that accumulating evidence from almost every domain of measurement is strongly inconsistent with that view—and presents differing perspectives on fear circuits. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [48] Barrett, 2019, Historical pitfalls and new directions in the neuroscience of emotion, Neurosci Lett source
    • cites [49] Barrett, 2012, Emotions are real, Emotion source
    • cites [50] Barrett, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [51] Barrett, 2017, The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization, Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci source
  • Premisecitation

    The underlying mechanisms for functional neurological disorder remain incompletely understood.

    “yet the underlying mechanisms for this condition remain incompletely understood.3,4”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Stone, 2009, Symptoms ‘unexplained by organic disease’ in 1144 new neurology out-patients: How often does the diagnosis change at follow-up?, Brain source
    • cites [4] Stephen, 2021, Assessment of emergency department and inpatient use and costs in adult and pediatric functional neurological disorders, JAMA Neurol source

      The Introduction describes FND symptoms as inconsistent with other neurological disorders, and the Conclusions say funding for FND research is scant. Neither passage addresses whether FND’s underlying mechanisms are understood; searches for mechanisms, pathophysiology, and unknown causes found no passage that does. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Precision signals tune the different incoming predictions and prediction errors through engagement of the salience network.

    “Therefore, precision signals (the third principle) tune the different incoming predictions and prediction errors through engagement of the salience network.[113][114][115]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [113] Shaffer, 2022, Allostasis, action and affect in depression: Insights from the theory of constructed emotion, Annu Rev Clin Psychol source

      In Hypothesis 3, the paper says precision signals modulate both prediction signals and prediction errors. In “Interoception Gives Rise to Affect,” it hypothesizes that the salience network modulates which prediction errors are learned. It does not establish that the salience network tunes predictions as well, and presents the network’s role as a hypothesis rather than a settled mechanism. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [114] Berntson, 2021, Neural circuits of interoception, Trends Neurosci source

      The Autonomic Efferent Pathways section says mice can modify interoceptive predictions in response to contextual changes, and the Integration section discusses feedback, feedforward, and incoming signals. Neither passage says that precision signals tune predictions or prediction errors through the salience network; searches for those terms found no such account in our copy. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [115] Seeley, 2007, Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control, J Neurosci source

      In “Functional significance of the salience and executive-control networks” (page unavailable), the paper proposes that the salience network integrates sensory data with visceral and autonomic information to identify relevant inputs. It does not say that precision signals tune incoming predictions or prediction errors through that network. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Predictions of the future are continually generated within the brain based on previous life experiences, as an array of parallel predictive simulations that come with a certain probability.

    “First, predictions of the future are continually generated within the brain: based on previous life experiences, an array of parallel predictive simulations are computed that all come with a certain probability. 96,[101][102]2][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 10 sources checked
    • cites [96] Sterling, 2012, Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation, Physiol Behav source
    • cites [101] Clark, 2013, Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science, Behav Brain Sci source

      Section 1.1 (p. 1) describes ongoing, multilayered brain predictions based on models that adapt to experience; section 2.4 (p. 10) describes probabilistic generative models. The passages do not establish the more specific claim that the brain computes an array of parallel simulations of possible futures, each with its own probability. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [102] Hohwy, 2020, Predictive processing as a systematic basis for identifying the neural correlates of consciousness, Philosophy Mind Sci source

      Section 5, “Core properties of PP” (page not available), describes brain predictions, perceptual learning from new data, Bayesian inference, and the weighing of different models. Section 8 discusses expected future prediction error. Neither passage establishes that the brain continually computes an array of parallel future simulations, each with a probability; the paper also distinguishes stronger from weaker claims about whether the brain literally uses generative models. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [103] Hutchinson, 2019, The power of predictions: An emerging paradigm for psychological research, Curr Dir Psychol Sci source

      In “Predictive Processing: Some Core Hypotheses” (page unavailable), the paper says the brain continually runs a generative internal model that recombines past experiences to predict expected sensory inputs. It does not say that the brain computes an array of parallel predictive simulations, each assigned a probability; its reference to “parallel trajectories” in the Abstract describes research approaches, not simulations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [104] Ainley, 2016, ‘Bodily precision’: A predictive coding account of individual differences in interoceptive accuracy, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci source

      The Introduction (page not provided) describes probabilistic predictions in the brain’s generative models, informed by sensory evidence. Section 2 (page not provided) says predictions and their precision are updated. The paper does not describe an array of parallel simulations of possible futures based on previous life experiences. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [105] Allen, 2020, Unravelling the neurobiology of interoceptive inference, Trends Cogn Sci source
    • cites [106] Seth, 2015 source
    • cites [107] Schulkin, 2019, Allostasis: A brain-centered, predictive mode of physiological regulation, Trends Neurosci source
    • cites [108] Friston, 2010, The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?, Nat Rev Neurosci source
    • cites [109] Smith, 2017, The hierarchical basis of neurovisceral integration, Neurosci Biobehav Rev source
  • May combine two claims. 19
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Supposed prototypic brain biomarkers for a given emotion category vary substantially across studies and across subjects within a given study.

    “Even the supposed prototypic brain 'biomarkers' for a given emotion category vary substantially across studies, 65,[72][73][74][75][76] and across subjects within a given study.34,55,63,65,69,[77][78][79][80][81][82][83]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim8 of 10 sources checked
    • cites [65] Wilson-Mendenhall, 2015, Variety in emotional life: Within-category typicality of emotional experiences is associated with neural activity in large-scale brain networks, Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci source

      The Abstract (page unavailable) reports different neural activity for typical versus atypical experiences within emotion categories, supporting variability in emotion-related brain activity. The cited paper does not establish that proposed brain biomarkers vary substantially across studies or across subjects within a study; its analyses report group-level effects. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [72] Horikawa, 2020, The neural representation of visually evoked emotion is high-dimensional, categorical, and distributed across transmodal brain regions, iScience source

      The Results section, “Inter-Individual Consistency in Brain Regions Representing Distinct Emotions” (page unavailable), concludes that emotion-related brain patterns were consistent across individuals, contrary to the claim of substantial within-study variation. The paper does not establish how biomarkers vary across studies; its Limitations section only raises individual differences as a possibility. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [73] Kassam, 2013, Identifying emotions on the basis of neural activation, PLoS ONE source

      The Introduction’s “Search for Neural Correlates of Emotion” section reports that meta-analyses found no brain region consistently and specifically activated by one emotion category, supporting the across-studies point for localized biomarkers. But the Results and Discussion report that emotion-related activation patterns share significant commonality across participants. Although the Results acknowledge individual variability, they do not establish that the patterns vary substantially across subjects within this study. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [74] Kragel, 2015, Multivariate neural biomarkers of emotional states are categorically distinct, Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci source
    • cites [75] Wager, 2015, A Bayesian model of category-specific emotional brain responses, PLoS Comput Biol source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says patterns that appear to distinguish emotion categories may vary from study to study, supporting the across-studies portion. The Discussion describes diverse instances within an emotion category, but this meta-analysis does not establish substantial variation across subjects within a given study; it also reports reliable category-level patterns across studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [76] Zhou, 2021, A distributed fMRI-based signature for the subjective experience of fear, Nat Commun source

      The Within-subject trial-wise prediction passage (page unavailable) describes fear experiences as differing between individuals and the population model as summarizing highly variable instances. But it does not establish that brain biomarkers vary substantially across studies or across subjects within a study; the Discussion instead says the fear signature generalized across participants, paradigms, and scanners. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [34] Siegel, 2018, Emotion fingerprints or emotion populations? A meta-analytic investigation of autonomic features of emotion categories, Psychol Bull source

      The Discussion (page not provided) says that proposed neural fingerprints for emotion categories do not replicate across studies, supporting the across-studies part. It discusses variation within individuals in behavior and autonomic responses, but does not establish that brain biomarkers vary across subjects within a single study. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [55] Le Mau, 2021, Professional actors demonstrate variability, not stereotypical expressions, when portraying emotional states in photographs, Nat Commun source

      The Introduction and Discussion describe variation in facial movements and photographed expressions across emotion instances and people. Searches for brain biomarkers and neural variability found no passage about brain biomarkers varying across studies or subjects within a study. The facial-expression findings do not establish the attributed brain-biomarker claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [63] Clark-Polner, 2017, Multivoxel pattern analysis does not provide evidence to support the existence of basic emotions, Cereb Cortex source
    • cites [69] Guillory, 2014, Exploring emotions using invasive methods: Review of 60 years of human intracranial electrophysiology, Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says that fear is represented in multiple brain areas and lists several sites where stimulation evoked it, supporting variation across studies rather than a unique anatomical marker. The Introduction (page unavailable) mentions individual variability in lesion-study behavioral results, but does not establish that brain biomarkers vary across subjects within a given study. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A central issue in contemporary discussions of functional neurological disorder has been the extent to which emotions play a mechanistic and aetiological role.

    “A central issue in contemporary discussions has revolved around questioning the extent to which emotions play a mechanistic and aetiological role in FND.23,28,30,31”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [23] Edwards, 2012, A Bayesian account of ‘hysteria’, Brain source
    • cites [28] Pick, 2019, Emotional processing in functional neurological disorder: A review, biopsychosocial model and research agenda, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry source
    • cites [30] Kanaan, 2016, Freud’s hysteria and its legacy, Handb Clin Neurol source
    • cites [31] Linden, 2013, Shell shock at Queen Square: Lewis Yealland 100 years on, Brain source

      In the Introduction section ‘In skilful and determined hands,’ the paper discusses psychological and physiological processes in the aetiology of functional neurological syndromes. ‘The power of suggestion’ contrasts Yealland’s approach with Myers’s search for an ‘emotional origin.’ These passages support discussion of possible psychological and emotional causes, but do not establish that the mechanistic and aetiological role of emotions is a central issue in contemporary debate. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Allostasis is concerned with metabolic efficiency instead of bringing a system back to a set point.

    “Distinct from homeostasis, allostasis is concerned with metabolic efficiency instead of bringing a system back to a set point (or various set-points).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [95] Quigley, 2021, Functions of interoception: From energy regulation to experience of the self, Trends Neurosci source
    • cites [96] Sterling, 2012, Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation, Physiol Behav source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    When an experience of emotion is used as a reference for the present constructed category, a conceptual category for emotion is constructed.

    “When an experience of emotion is used as a reference for the present constructed category, we are constructing a conceptual category for emotion.58,143”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [58] Hoemann, 2019, Emotion words, emotion concepts, and emotional development in children: A constructionist hypothesis, Dev Psychol source
    • cites [143] Xu, 2013, Infants are rational constructivist learners, Curr Dir Psychol Sci source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Supervised category learning such as word learning is an important source of emotional development and cultural inheritance.

    “Thus, 'supervised category learning' such as word learning is an important source of emotional development and cultural inheritance.58,141,157,158”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [58] Hoemann, 2019, Emotion words, emotion concepts, and emotional development in children: A constructionist hypothesis, Dev Psychol source

      In “A Constructionist Proposal for Emotional Development” (page unavailable), the authors propose that caregiver emotion words may guide children’s learning of emotion categories and their cultural inheritance. The claim presents this as an established source of development and calls it “supervised” learning, whereas the paper frames it as a hypothesis and says infants more often observe incidental uses of emotion words than receive explicit labels. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [141] Hoemann, 2020, Developing an understanding of emotion categories: Lessons from objects, Trends Cogn Sci source

      In “Applying a Developmental Cascades Approach to Emotion Category Learning” (page unavailable), the paper proposes that caregivers’ emotion labels and children’s word learning may shape developing emotion categories. “Implications for Future Research” discusses cultural variation in emotion categories, but does not establish word learning as a mechanism of cultural inheritance. The paper also presents the developmental role of labels as a hypothesis, rather than an established finding. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [157] Gelman, 2017, How language shapes the cultural inheritance of categories, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA source

      The Abstract (page not provided) describes category labels and word learning as means of transmitting categories across generations, and the Conclusions say labels and generics enhance cumulative cultural evolution. The paper notes cultural variation in how emotions are classified, but it does not establish that word learning is an important source of emotional development or characterize the process as ‘supervised category learning.’ (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [158] Gendron, 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hyperarousal is common in FND, exemplified by the observation of panic attack without panic in people with functional seizures, as well as increased sympathetic tone and abnormal startle responses in FND populations.

    “Hyperarousal is common in FND; this is exemplified by the observation of 'panic attack without panic' in people with functional seizures, as well as increased sympathetic tone and abnormal startle responses in FND populations.21,46,164,165”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [21] Goldstein, 2006, Ictal symptoms of anxiety, avoidance behaviour, and dissociation in patients with dissociative seizures, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry source
    • cites [46] Paredes-Echeverri, 2022, Autonomic, endocrine, and inflammation profiles in functional neurological disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports increased autonomic arousal and more consistent markers of increased sympathetic tone in children and adolescents with FND, but emphasizes heterogeneous findings in adults. Results > Autonomic Findings (page unavailable) reports an increased startle-response probability in one study of functional movement disorder and no group difference in another. The paper does not report the cited observation of a ‘panic attack without panic’ in people with functional seizures, so it does not support that example or the unqualified generalization across FND populations. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [164] Dreissen, 2017, Startle responses in functional jerky movement disorders are increased but have a normal pattern, Parkinsonism Relat Disord source
    • cites [165] Seignourel, 2007, Abnormal affective startle modulation in individuals with psychogenic [corrected] movement disorder, Mov Disord source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Other proposed emotion processing mechanisms for FND are not incorrect, but rather incomplete, with a constructionist perspective addressing an important gap.

    “Furthermore, we think that other proposed emotion processing mechanisms for FND are not incorrect, but rather incomplete-with a constructionist perspective addressing an important gap.27,28”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] Sojka, 2018, Processing of emotion in functional neurological disorder, Front Psychiatry source
    • cites [28] Pick, 2019, Emotional processing in functional neurological disorder: A review, biopsychosocial model and research agenda, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neuroimaging studies in FND cohorts have detected subtle functional and structural alterations compared to healthy controls, as well as correlates of illness severity and predisposing vulnerabilities.

    “Neuroimaging studies in FND cohorts using a range of imaging modalities have detected subtle functional and structural alterations compared to healthy controls, as well as correlates of illness severity and predisposing vulnerabilities.8,207,208”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] Baizabal-Carvallo, 2019, Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of functional (psychogenic) movement disorders, Neurobiol Dis source
    • cites [207] Bègue, 2019, Structural alterations in functional neurological disorder and related conditions: a software and hardware problem?, Neuroimage Clin source
    • cites [208] Sasikumar, 2021, The neuroimaging evidence of brain abnormalities in functional movement disorders, Brain source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such miscalculations could predispose to chronic negative affect and altered predictions, which offers an explanatory framework for behavioural and physiological findings of altered responses to 'emotional' stimuli in people with FND.

    “Such 'miscalculations' could predispose to chronic negative affect and altered predictions, which offers an explanatory framework for behavioural and physiological findings of altered responses to 'emotional' stimuli in people with FND.27,28,44”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [27] Sojka, 2018, Processing of emotion in functional neurological disorder, Front Psychiatry source

      In “Affective excitation in FND” (page unavailable), the review proposes inefficient interoceptive predictions and reports heightened cortical and autonomic arousal. “Organization of studies” (page unavailable) describes altered responses to emotional stimuli in FND. The paper does not establish the claimed link from these prediction errors to chronic negative affect. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [28] Pick, 2019, Emotional processing in functional neurological disorder: A review, biopsychosocial model and research agenda, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry source
    • cites [44] Jungilligens, 2020, Impaired emotional and behavioural awareness and control in patients with dissociative seizures, Psychol Med source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The expansion of the human brain allows for compression and dimensionality reduction, suggesting that we can assemble multimodal summaries (features) in early infancy and later in life.

    “The expansion of the human brain allows for compression and dimensionality reduction, suggesting that we can assemble multimodal summaries (i.e.features) in early infancy and later in life.129,141,142”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [129] Katsumi, Functional connectivity gradients as a common neural architecture for predictive processing in the human brain. source

      The section on functional connectivity gradients describes compression and dimensionality reduction of sensory information and hypothesizes that low-dimensional, multimodal summaries are reassembled as prediction signals (page unavailable). It does not attribute this process to expansion of the human brain or establish that it occurs in early infancy and later life; the Methods describe datasets of young adults. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [141] Hoemann, 2020, Developing an understanding of emotion categories: Lessons from objects, Trends Cogn Sci source

      In “Learning Abstract Categories via Developmental Cascades” (page unavailable), the paper describes infants learning abstract object features and inferring functional similarities across perceptually different instances. It does not link this ability to expansion of the human brain or describe it as compression or dimensionality reduction; nor does it establish the claimed process later in life. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [142] Finlay, 2015, Developmental mechanisms channeling cortical evolution, Trends Neurosci source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since FND is mechanistically and aetiologically heterogenous, a range of other mechanisms articulated in the field remain relevant.

    “Lastly, since FND is mechanistically and aetiologically heterogenous, a range of other mechanisms articulated in the field remain relevant.8,22,23,[26][27][28][29]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] Baizabal-Carvallo, 2019, Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of functional (psychogenic) movement disorders, Neurobiol Dis source
    • cites [22] Baslet, 2011, Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: a model of their pathogenic mechanism, Seizure source

      The Conclusion describes several possible pathogenic mechanisms and different combinations of vulnerabilities in psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). Section 2.1.4 also says PNES episodes may involve multiple mechanisms and may or may not relate to past trauma. This supports mechanistic and aetiological heterogeneity for PNES, but the paper does not establish the claim for FND as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [23] Edwards, 2012, A Bayesian account of ‘hysteria’, Brain source

      In “Influences from outside the somatomotor network” (page unavailable), the paper allows contributions from other brain areas, and its Conclusions describe a range of predisposing factors. But it proposes a single final common pathway for functional motor and sensory symptoms; it does not support the claim that they are mechanistically heterogeneous or that distinct mechanisms remain relevant on that basis. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In FND populations, elevated dissociation has been related to anxiety levels, lower interoceptive accuracy, maternal disfunction, other psychiatric comorbidities and childhood trauma.

    “In FND populations, elevated dissociation has been related to anxiety levels, 21 lower interoceptive accuracy, 184,191 maternal disfunction, 192 other psychiatric comorbidities 169 and childhood trauma.169”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21] Goldstein, 2006, Ictal symptoms of anxiety, avoidance behaviour, and dissociation in patients with dissociative seizures, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) describes dissociative seizures as a response to acute anxiety and heightened arousal, supporting a link between dissociation and attack-related anxiety. But the study found no raised general anxiety levels in the dissociative-seizure group, so it does not support an unqualified association with anxiety levels. This citation is attached only to the anxiety part of the sentence, not the other listed factors. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [184] Koreki, 2020, Trait and state interoceptive abnormalities are associated with dissociation and seizure frequency in patients with functional seizures, Epilepsia source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports both higher dissociation and lower interoceptive accuracy in patients with functional seizures than in controls. But within patients, dissociation was significantly associated with the discrepancy between perceived and measured interoceptive ability, not with accuracy alone. This verdict concerns only the lower-interoceptive-accuracy clause attached to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [191] Pick, 2020, Dissociation and interoception in functional neurological disorder, Cogn Neuropsychiatry source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Heightened arousal is linked to defensive behaviours driven by the periaqueductal grey, such as tonic immobility and fight or flight responses, which are behavioural programmes that share overlapping semiological features with functional seizures.

    “Additionally, heightened arousal is linked to defensive behaviours driven by the periaqueductal grey, such as tonic immobility and fight or flight responses-behavioural programmes that share overlapping semiological features with functional seizures.45,[171][172][173][174]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [45] Aybek, 2015, Emotion-motion interactions in conversion disorder: An FMRI study, PLoS ONE source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [171] Roelofs, 2017, Freeze for action: Neurobiological mechanisms in animal and human freezing, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [172] Diez, 2019, Corticolimbic fast-tracking: enhanced multimodal integration in functional neurological disorder, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [173] Zito, 2019, Abnormal postural behavior in patients with functional movement disorders during exposure to stress, Psychoneuroendocrinology source
    • cites [174] Schneider, 2022, Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Are they a freeze reaction?, Epilepsy Behav source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some people with FND show deficits in sensory processing, interoceptive accuracy, biased attention and impairments in motor learning.

    “While individual differences are important, data indicate that some people with FND show deficits in sensory processing, interoceptive accuracy, biased attention and impairments in motor learning.90,91,[179][180][181][182][183][184]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim6 of 8 sources checked
    • cites [90] Huys, 2021, Misdirected attentional focus in functional tremor, Brain. source

      The Results (Part I) and Discussion report altered attentional focus in people with functional tremor: they attended more to visual feedback of their movement than the control groups. The paper measured detection of movement-related signals, but does not establish a general sensory-processing deficit or report deficits in interoceptive accuracy or motor learning. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [91] Lin, 2020, Dissociated motor learning and de-adaptation in patients with functional gait disorders, Brain source
    • cites [179] Pareés, 2012, ‘Jumping to conclusions’ bias in functional movement disorders, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry source
    • cites [180] Pick, 2018, Implicit attentional bias for facial emotion in dissociative seizures: Additional evidence, Epilepsy Behav source
    • cites [181] Bakvis, 2009, Trauma, stress, and preconscious threat processing in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, Epilepsia source

      The Discussion reports that patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures showed an attentional bias toward masked angry faces and describes impaired emotional information processing. This supports the biased-attention part of the claim, but the paper does not establish deficits in interoceptive accuracy or motor learning, or a general sensory-processing deficit. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [182] Sojka, 2021, Individual differences in interoceptive accuracy and prediction error in motor functional neurological disorders: A DTI study, Hum Brain Mapp source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports prior evidence of cardiac interoceptive deficits in FND and suggests that impairment may occur only in a subset, consistent with the claim’s 'some people' qualifier. The study itself found no group-level difference in cardiac interoceptive accuracy. The Introduction mentions attentional biases and sensory-related processes, but the passages do not establish the claimed deficits in sensory processing, biased attention, or motor learning. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [183] Ricciardi, 2021, Exploring three levels of interoception in people with functional motor disorders, Parkinsonism Relat Disord source

      The Discussion reports lower cardiac interoceptive accuracy in patients with functional motor disorders than in healthy controls, supporting the interoceptive-accuracy part of the claim. The paper does not establish biased attention or impaired motor learning; its Results report no significant group difference on the attention and executive-function test. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [184] Koreki, 2020, Trait and state interoceptive abnormalities are associated with dissociation and seizure frequency in patients with functional seizures, Epilepsia source

      The Results (Group comparisons; page not provided) report significantly reduced interoceptive accuracy in patients with functional seizures, supporting that part of the sentence. The passages do not establish the other listed deficits—sensory processing more broadly, biased attention, or impaired motor learning. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Prediction errors are the mismatch between anticipated and actual sensory input, and are used to update and improve subsequent predictions.

    “Prediction errors, the second principle, are the mismatch between anticipated and actual sensory input, and are used to update and improve subsequent predictions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Affect serves as a subjective barometer of the in-the-moment estimation of the energetic state of the body, and influences the moment-to-moment perception of incoming information.

    “Affect serves as a subjective barometer of the in-the-moment estimation of the energetic state of the body, and influences the moment-to-moment perception of incoming information.121”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [121] Wormwood, Emotion and threat detection: The roles of affect and conceptual knowledge, Emotion source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fatigue is highly prevalent and a chief predictor of quality of life in motor FND, more so than motor symptom severity.

    “Fatigue is highly prevalent and a chief predictor of quality of life in motor FND, more so than motor symptom severity.6,163”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6] Butler, 2021, International online survey of 1048 individuals with functional neurological disorder, Eur J Neurol source
    • cites [163] Gelauff, 2018, Fatigue, not self-rated motor symptom severity, affects quality of life in functional motor disorders, J Neurol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Each constructed conceptual category for an emotion is situation-specific; therefore, the category itself encompasses varying features and there are no two identical instances of an emotion.

    “Importantly, each constructed conceptual category for an emotion is situation-specific; therefore, the category itself encompasses varying features (i.e.we can construct happiness with the touch of warm water in a winter day or cold water in a summer day) and there are no two identical instances of an emotion (i.e. the happiness felt on the summer day is different from that of the winter day).50”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] Barrett, 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    The theory of constructed emotion offers a constructionist approach to understanding what emotions are by leveraging the brain's primary role in energy regulation and predictive processing.

    “The theory of constructed emotion offers a constructionist approach to understanding what emotions are by leveraging the brain's primary role in energy regulation and predictive processing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Ad hoc conceptual categories of emotion are compressed summaries that categorize physical signals, give them emotional meaning and render the experience an instance of that emotion category.

    “Therefore, ad hoc conceptual categories of emotion are compressed summaries that categorize physical signals, give them emotional meaning and render the experience an instance of that emotion category (Fig. 5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Life experiences, especially those in critical developmental stages, form the basis of concept formation, which might be updated throughout life to enable a more fine-grained repertoire of emotion concepts.

    “Relatedly, life experiences, especially those in critical developmental stages, form the basis of concept formation, which might be updated throughout life to enable a more fine-grained repertoire of (emotion) concepts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    High arousal states that are frequently although not exclusively coupled with a negative valence are recognized to be associated with paroxysmal motor phenomena and perceptual distortions.

    “High arousal states that are frequently although not exclusively coupled with a negative valence (e.g. during an altercation or in the immediate aftermath of a car crash) are recognized to be associated with paroxysmal motor phenomena (e.g.tremulous movements, stuttering speech), perceptual distortions (e.g.dizziness, derealization)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    The ability to construct abstract categories is determined by the degree of compression in the features that the brain can support.

    “The ability to construct abstract categories is determined by the degree of compression in the features that the brain can support.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In FND populations, insecure attachment has been linked to increased symptom severity, childhood maltreatment and poor clinical outcomes.

    “in this population, insecure attachment has also been linked to increased symptom severity, childhood maltreatment and poor clinical outcomes.206”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [206] Brown, 2013, Emotional dysregulation, alexithymia, and attachment in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, Epilepsy Behav source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    When people with FND state that they are not anxious or depressed, despite externally presenting information seemingly to the contrary, they are correct.

    “When people with FND state that they are not anxious or depressed, despite externally presenting information seemingly to the contrary, they are correct.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The human brain is most neuroplastic earlier in life, suggesting that the qualities of certain acquired concepts may be carried forward and less malleable to modification later in life.

    “Relatedly, the human brain is most neuroplastic earlier in life, suggesting that the qualities of certain acquired concepts may be carried forward and less malleable to modification later in life.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The human brain is most neuroplastic earlier in life.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Altered emotion construction in some individuals is sufficient to mechanistically explain the development and maintenance of FND and related functional somatic symptoms.

    “We argue that the altered emotion construction in some individuals is sufficient to mechanistically explain the development and maintenance of FND and related functional somatic symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The theory of constructed emotion offers a framework for reconceptualizing and integrating the relevance of emotion and its aberrant construction in the pathophysiology of FND.

    “In conclusion, the theory of constructed emotion offers a framework for reconceptualizing and integrating the relevance of emotion (and its aberrant construction) in the pathophysiology of FND.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In some people with FND, functional neurological symptoms occur due to deficits in the repertoire of available emotion concepts and/or impairments in constructing a conceptual category for an emotion in a particular instance.

    “In some people with FND, we posit that functional neurological symptoms occur due to deficits in the repertoire of available emotion concepts and/or impairments in constructing a conceptual category for an emotion in a particular instance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The theory of constructed emotion framework provides insight into potential mechanisms most relevant for people with FND who report alexithymia, 'panic attack without panic', comorbid psychopathology, fatigue and/or a high burden of early-life adversity.

    “Thus, the theory of constructed emotion framework provides insight into potential mechanisms most relevant for people with FND who report alexithymia, 'panic attack without panic', comorbid psychopathology, fatigue and/or a high burden of early-life adversity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There is altered prediction error learning in FND.

    “Proposal 3: There is altered prediction error learning in FND”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some forms of functional weakness can be conceptualized as either a derivative of tonic immobility occurring during high arousal, or potentially a manifestation of a low arousal and probably non-conscious low motivational state.

    “By extension, some forms of functional weakness can be conceptualized as either a derivative of tonic immobility occurring during high arousal, or potentially a manifestation of a low arousal (and probably non-conscious low motivational) state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The availability and reliance on non-emotion, bodily/health-focused concepts, and the related pervasive tendency to categorize incoming afferent sensory information as non-emotion instances, is specific to functional disorders.

    “Rather, we posit that the availability and reliance on non-emotion, bodily/health-focused concepts (and the related pervasive tendency to categorize incoming afferent sensory information as non-emotion instances) is specific to functional disorders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Dissociation within the theory of constructed emotion framework could be conceptualized in part as the momentary uncoupling of the brain's higher-level generative models of the internal state of the body and of the body in the world.

    “While dissociation is probably mechanistically heterogeneous, dissociation within the theory of constructed emotion framework could be conceptualized in part as the momentary uncoupling of the brain's higher-level generative models of the internal state of the body (interoception) and of the body in the world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Symptoms such as the tremor, stutter and cognitive difficulties in such situations are both physiological and involuntary.

    “Symptoms such as the tremor, stutter and cognitive difficulties in such situations are both physiological and involuntary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This uncoupling could then be experienced as a dissociative event, where the conscious feature of interoception, affect, does not 'match' the constructed experience in the service of allostasis.

    “This uncoupling could then be experienced as a dissociative event, where the conscious feature of interoception, affect, does not 'match' the constructed experience in the service of allostasis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Individuals may make sense of physical symptoms by constructing a conceptual category of 'fear' or 'being shocked'.

    “In such instances, individuals may make sense of these physical symptoms by constructing a conceptual category of 'fear' or 'being shocked'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    If an individual lacks a relevant emotion concept or does not construct a conceptual category for an emotion in that instance, such experiences could be represented as a non-emotion category, for example 'shaking'.

    “If an individual lacks a relevant emotion concept or does not construct a conceptual category for an emotion in that instance, such experiences could be represented as a non-emotion category (e.g.'shaking').”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
38 of 38
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ongoing debate about emotions in functional neurological disorder has largely omitted the question of what emotions are in the first place.

    “Critical in this context, however, is that this ongoing debate has largely omitted the question of what emotions are in the first place.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Functional neurological disorder is mechanistically and aetiologically heterogenous.

    “While we continue to support that functional neurological disorder is mechanistically and aetiologically heterogenous, consideration of how the theory of constructed emotion relates to the generation and maintenance of functional neurological and functional somatic symptoms offers an integrated viewpoint that cuts across neurology, psychiatry, psychology and cognitive-affective neuroscience.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The respective roles of the proposed mechanisms across individuals with functional neurological disorder may vary.

    “Their respective roles across individuals with FND may also vary.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The brain's modelling of the condition of the body is mostly not accessible to awareness.

    “This inconsistency may relate in part to the notion that the brain's modelling of the condition of the body is mostly not accessible to awareness.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The human brain is most neuroplastic earlier in life.

    “Relatedly, the human brain is most neuroplastic earlier in life, suggesting that the qualities of certain acquired concepts may be carried forward and less malleable to modification later in life.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Illness-promoting psychological processes that emerge in the minds of children with FND function in a top-down fashion to activate and modulate the stress system, thereby contributing to the activation or maintenance of the illness process.

    “We look at illness-promoting psychological processes that emerge in the minds of children with FND and that function—in a top-down fashion—to activate and modulate the stress system, thereby contributing to the activation or maintenance of the illness process [23,24,25,26,27].”

    From Illness-Promoting Psychological Processes in Children and Adolescents with Functional Neurological Disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    In “Allostasis and the predictive brain” (page unavailable), the paper describes brain-based concepts guiding bodily regulation through regions connected to autonomic and endocrine systems. “Proposal 1” (page unavailable) suggests that inefficient emotion construction may contribute to the development and maintenance of FND symptoms, and discusses children with FND. It does not specifically establish that psychological processes in children with FND activate a stress system to initiate or maintain illness; it instead frames the mechanism as a proposed account of inefficient allostasis. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A child's expectations are reflected in her body, thoughts, and feelings and can potentially affect the course of her symptoms through mind-brain-body pathways.

    “The child’s expectations will thus be reflected in her body, thoughts, and feelings and can potentially, through a range of mind–brain–body pathways, affect the course of her symptoms [24,25,27,38,39].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Briquet, 1859, Traite clinique et terapeutique de l'hystérie
  2. Charcot, 1887, Leçons du mardi á la Salpêtrière: policliniques, 1887–1888
  3. Breuer, 1895, Studien über Hysterie
  4. Sollier, 1897, Genèse et Nature de L´hystérie: Recherches Cliniques et Expérimentales de Psycho-Physiologie
  5. Oppenheim, 1900, Diseases of the nervous system: A textbook for student and practitioner of medicine
  6. Babinski, 1918, Hysteria or Pithiatism trans. By Rolleston J
  7. Seth, 2015, Open mind
  8. Paquola, 2021, The unique cytoarchitecture and wiring of the human default mode network, bioRxiv
  9. Barsalou, 2010, The mind in context, 334
  10. Spivey, 2007, The continuity of the brain
  11. Mesquita, 2022, Between us: How cultures create emotions
  12. Noe, 2004, Action in perception, 277

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jungilligens, J., Paredes-Echeverri, S., Popkirov, S., Barrett, L. F., & Perez, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum (DE)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Jungilligens, Johannes
Venue
Brain
Published
2022-06-02
Volume
145
Issue
8
Pages
2648-2663
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W4281736248
Cited by
164
References
237
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 6
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIMH (K23MH111983)
  • Ruhr University Bochum Research School
  • NIH
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
conversion disorder, theory of constructed emotion, functional somatic symptoms, allostasis, predictive processing, interoception, affect, energy regulation, alexithymia, dissociation, insecure attachment, life experience, symptom generation, therapeutic implications
MeSH terms
Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Affective Symptoms, Brain, Conversion Disorder, Emotions, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review