The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Ecological Impact of Biofuels
Abstract
The ecological impact of biofuels is mediated through their effects on land, air, and water. In 2008, about 33.3 million ha were used to produce food-based biofuels and their coproducts. Biofuel production from food crops is expected to increase 170% by 2020. Economic model estimates for land-use change (LUC) associated with food-based biofuels are 67–365 ha 10−6 l−1, leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions for decades compared to business as usual. Biodiversity is reduced by about 60% in U.S. corn and soybean fields and by about 85% in Southeast Asian oil palm plantations compared to unconverted habitat. Consequently, the largest ecological impact of biofuel production may well come from market-mediated LUC. Mitigating this impact requires targeting biofuel production to degraded and abandoned cropland and rangeland; increasing crop yields and livestock production efficiency; use of wastes, residues, and wildlife-friendly crops; and compensatory offsite mitigation for residual direct and indirect impacts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Transitioning lands in other uses to biofuel feedstock production will affect the carbon stocks of these lands (Melillo et al. , 2009; Fargione et al. , 2010).”
From Influence of spatially dependent, modeled soil carbon emission factors on life‐cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn and cellulosic ethanol (2016) · cites this paper as Fargione et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“Land and climate are two major resources required for additional biomass production [44,61,62].”
From Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment (2018) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“Most studies agreed that, without land use change impacts, biofuels release much less GHG emissions than their fossil fuel counterparts on a per unit energy basis [6,7,44].”
From Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment (2018) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“Further, land use or land management change may affect the overall estimation, particularly in China [10,44,69].”
From Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment (2018) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
Thring, M. W. (1977) · Electronics and Power · doi:10.1049/ep.1977.0180 · Cited by 7,338
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T.-H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151861 · Cited by 4,888 · cited 6×
“Changes in land use are commonly assumed to occur at the observed agricultural frontier in each region, based on historical records (Hertel et al. 2010, Searchinger et al. 2008) or satellite image analysis (Harris et al. 2009, USEPA 2010).”
InfluentialRibeiro, M. C., Metzger, J. P., Martensen, A. C., Ponzoni, F. J., & Hirota, M. M. (2009) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021 · Cited by 4,282
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902
Self-citationGlobal and regional climate changes due to black carbon
Ramanathan, V., & Carmichael, G. R. (2008) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo156 · Cited by 3,733
QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES
Wilcove, D., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., & Losos, E. (1998) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313420 · Cited by 3,357
Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation
GEIST, H. J., & LAMBIN, E. F. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:pcaudf]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,123
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604600103 · Cited by 2,871
Self-citationEthanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals
Farrell, A. E., Plevin, R. J., Turner, B. T., Jones, A. D., O'Hare, M., & Kammen, D. M. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1121416 · Cited by 2,823
Self-citationCarbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass
Tilman, D., Hill, J., & Lehman, C. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133306 · Cited by 1,813
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Babcock BA, 2009, Iowa Ag Rev., 15
- Blanco-Canqui H, 2008, Soil Water Manag. Conserv., 72, 693
- CARB, 2009, Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Vol. I, Staff Report: Initial Statement of Reasons
- Counc. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2007, Biofuel Feedstocks: The Risk of Future Invasions
- FAO, 2008, The State of Food and Agriculture–Biofuels: Prospects, Risks and Opportunities
- FAPRI, 2009, U.S. and World Agricultural Outlook
- Foreman LF, 2006, Econ. Inf. Bull. No. 7
- GAO, 2007, Rep. GAO-07-1054
- Harris N, 2009, Land use change and emission factors: updates since the RFS proposed rule
- 10.1017/S1074070800002935 · DOI
- Hensen IE., 2003, Oil Palm Bull., 46, 15
- Hess P, 2009, Biofuels: Environmental Consequences and Interactions with Changing Land Use. Proc., 169
- ISO, 2006, ISO 14040: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. Rep. ISO 14040:2006(E)
- ISO, 2006, ISO 14044: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. Rep. ISO 14044:2006(E)
- Roberts MG, 2007, Potential Impacts of Biofuels Expansion on Natural Resources; a Case Study of the Ogallala Aquifer Region
- Stickler C, 2007, Readiness for REDD: A Preliminary Global Assessment of Tropical Forested Land Suitability for Agriculture
- USDA, 2009, Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey (2008) AC-07-SS-1
- USEPA, 2009, Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis: Changes to Renewable Fuel Standard Program
- USEPA, 2010, Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis
- Vyn TJ, West TD, Steinhardt GC. 2000. Corn and soybean response to tillage and rotation systems on a dark prairie soil: 25year review. Proc. 15th Conf. Int. Soil Tillage Res. Organ., July 2–6, Forth Worth, Tex.
- Weidema B, Ekvall T. 2009. Consequential LCA: Chapter for CALCAS deliverable D18, 2009 “Guidelines for applications of deepened and broadened LCA,” (CALCAS) Co-ordination Action innovation in Life-Cycle Analy. Sustain.Available athttp://www.lca-net.com/files/consequential_LCA_CALCAS_final.pdf
- Yusoff S, 2007, Int. J. Life Cycle Anal., 1, 50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Natural climate solutions for the United States
Fargione, J. E., Bassett, S., Boucher, T., Bridgham, S. D., Conant, R. T., Cook-Patton, S. C., Ellis, P. W., Falcucci, A., Fourqurean, J. W., Gopalakrishna, T., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat1869 · Cited by 588
Self-citationRenewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy
Gasparatos, A., Doll, C. N. H., Esteban, M., Ahmed, A., & Olang, T. A. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030 · Cited by 618
A review of the ecosystem functions in oil palm plantations, using forests as a reference system
Dislich, C., Keyel, A. C., Salecker, J., Kisel, Y., Meyer, K., Auliya, M., Barnes, A. D., Corre, M. D., Darras, K., Faust, H., et al. (2016) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12295 · Cited by 438
Northrup, J. M., & Wittemyer, G. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12009 · Cited by 287
Biomass production for bioenergy using marginal lands
Mehmood, M. A., Ibrahim, M., Rashid, U., Nawaz, M., Ali, S., Hussain, A., & Gull, M. (2017) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2016.08.003 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Fargione, J. E., Plevin, R. J., & Hill, J. D.
- Affiliations
- The Nature Conservancy (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2010-12-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 351-377
- ISSN
- 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2069
- OpenAlex
- W2059032638
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Keywords
- biofuels, land use change, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity loss, oil palm plantations, rangeland, crop yield, compensatory mitigation, ecological impacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
