CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 233Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchWeed Control and Herbicide ApplicationsGenetic diversity and population structure

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introgression of Crop Alleles into Wild or Weedy Populations

Open access
Ellstrand, Norman C., Meirmans, Patrick, Rong, Jun, Bartsch, Detlef, Ghosh, Atiyo, de Jong, Tom J., Haccou, Patsy, Lu, Bao-Rong, Snow, Allison A., Neal Stewart, C., Strasburg, Jared L., van Tienderen, Peter H., Vrieling, Klaas, Hooftman, Danny·2013·Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135840
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The evolutionary significance of introgression has been discussed for decades. Questions about potential impacts of transgene flow into wild and weedy populations brought renewed attention to the introgression of crop alleles into those populations. In the past two decades, the field has advanced with considerable descriptive, experimental, and theoretical activity on the dynamics of crop gene introgression and its consequences. As illustrated by five case studies employing an array of different approaches, introgression of crop alleles has occurred for a wide array of species, sometimes without significant consequence, but on occasion leading to the evolution of increased weediness. A new theoretical context has emerged for analyzing empirical data, identifying factors that influence introgression, and predicting introgression's progress. With emerging molecular techniques and analyses, research on crop allele introgression into wild and weedy populations is positioned to make contributions to both transgene risk assessment and reticulate evolution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135840

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 118 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. James C, 2012, ISAAA Brief
  2. Natl. Res. Counc, 1996, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Scientific Society.
  3. Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev, 1993, Safety Considerations for Biotechnology: Scale-up of Crop Plants.
  4. Walker RD, 2009, Hamline Law Rev., 32, 499

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ellstrand, N. C., Meirmans, P., Rong, J., Bartsch, D., Ghosh, A., de Jong, T. J., Haccou, P., Lu, B.-R., Snow, A. A., Neal Stewart, C., Strasburg, J. L., van Tienderen, P. H., Vrieling, K., & Hooftman, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Nanchang University (CN)
  • Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (DE)
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
  • Institute of Biology, Leiden University, 2333 BE Leiden, The Netherlands;,
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996;
  • University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
  • Instituut voor Biodiversiteit en Ecosysteem Dynamica, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2013-11-23
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
325-345
ISSN
  • 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2069
DOI
10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135840
OpenAlex
W2121440714
Cited by
233
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1020799)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • Universiteit Leiden
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Lorentz Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
transgene flow, natural populations, reticulate evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review