The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introgression of Crop Alleles into Wild or Weedy Populations
Open accessAbstract
The evolutionary significance of introgression has been discussed for decades. Questions about potential impacts of transgene flow into wild and weedy populations brought renewed attention to the introgression of crop alleles into those populations. In the past two decades, the field has advanced with considerable descriptive, experimental, and theoretical activity on the dynamics of crop gene introgression and its consequences. As illustrated by five case studies employing an array of different approaches, introgression of crop alleles has occurred for a wide array of species, sometimes without significant consequence, but on occasion leading to the evolution of increased weediness. A new theoretical context has emerged for analyzing empirical data, identifying factors that influence introgression, and predicting introgression's progress. With emerging molecular techniques and analyses, research on crop allele introgression into wild and weedy populations is positioned to make contributions to both transgene risk assessment and reticulate evolution.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Gene flow from GM crops to wild or locally adapted crops could reduce biological diversity through genetic assimilation ( 108 )”
From Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops (2024) · cites this paper as [108]
Citations
Cites
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,871
EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS
Wright, S. (1931) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 · Cited by 9,237
A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species
Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., & Mitchell, S. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019379 · Cited by 6,461
A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome
Green, R. E., Krause, J., Briggs, A. W., Maricic, T., Stenzel, U., Kircher, M., Patterson, N., Li, H., Zhai, W., Fritz, M. H.-Y., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188021 · Cited by 4,318
Rapid SNP Discovery and Genetic Mapping Using Sequenced RAD Markers
Baird, N. A., Etter, P. D., Atwood, T. S., Currey, M. C., Shiver, A. L., Lewis, Z., Selker, E. U., Cresko, W. A., & Johnson, E. A. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003376 · Cited by 3,452
Population Genetic Consequences of Small Population Size: Implications for Plant Conservation
Ellstrand, N. C., & Elam, D. R. (1993) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001245 · Cited by 2,649
Self-citationBayesian Inference of Recent Migration Rates Using Multilocus Genotypes
Wilson, G. A., & Rannala, B. H. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/163.3.1177 · Cited by 1,993
Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST≠1/(4Nm+1)
Whitlock, M. C., & McCauley, D. E. (1999) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6884960 · Cited by 1,529
A Model-Based Method for Identifying Species Hybrids Using Multilocus Genetic Data
Anderson, E. C., & Thompson, E. A. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/160.3.1217 · Cited by 1,505
New flora of the British Isles
Stace, C. A., & Thompson, H. S. (1991) · Cited by 1,444
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- James C, 2012, ISAAA Brief
- Natl. Res. Counc, 1996, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Scientific Society.
- Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev, 1993, Safety Considerations for Biotechnology: Scale-up of Crop Plants.
- Walker RD, 2009, Hamline Law Rev., 32, 499
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mallet, J., Besansky, N. J., & Hahn, M. W. (2015) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201500149 · Cited by 597
Hybridization in Plants: Old Ideas, New Techniques
Goulet‐Scott, B. E., Roda, F., & Hopkins, R. (2016) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.16.01340 · Cited by 367
Warschefsky, E. J., Penmetsa, R. V., Cook, D. R., & von Wettberg, E. (2014) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1400116 · Cited by 322
Is gene flow the most important evolutionary force in plants?
Ellstrand, N. C. (2014) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1400024 · Cited by 272
Self-citationHybrid zones: windows on climate change
Taylor, S. A., Larson, E. L., & Harrison, R. G. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.04.010 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellstrand, N. C., Meirmans, P., Rong, J., Bartsch, D., Ghosh, A., de Jong, T. J., Haccou, P., Lu, B.-R., Snow, A. A., Neal Stewart, C., Strasburg, J. L., van Tienderen, P. H., Vrieling, K., & Hooftman, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Nanchang University (CN)
- Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (DE)
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
- Institute of Biology, Leiden University, 2333 BE Leiden, The Netherlands;,
- Leiden University (NL)
- Fudan University (CN)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996;
- University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
- Instituut voor Biodiversiteit en Ecosysteem Dynamica, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2013-11-23
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 325-345
- ISSN
- 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2069
- OpenAlex
- W2121440714
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (publishedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1020799)
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
- Universiteit Leiden
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Lorentz Center
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- transgene flow, natural populations, reticulate evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
