CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 510Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFish Ecology and Management StudiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ecological Restoration of Streams and Rivers: Shifting Strategies and Shifting Goals

Open access
Palmer, Margaret A., Hondula, Kelly L., Koch, Benjamin J.·2014·Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091935
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Ecological restoration has grown rapidly and now encompasses not only classic ecological theory but also utilitarian concerns, such as preparedness for climate change and provisioning of ecosystem services. Three dominant perspectives compete to influence the science and practice of river restoration. A strong focus on channel morphology has led to approaches that involve major Earth-moving activities, such as channel reconfiguration with the unmet assumption that ecological recovery will follow. Functional perspectives of river restoration aim to regain the full suite of biogeochemical, ecological, and hydrogeomorphic processes that make up a healthy river, and though there is well-accepted theory to support this, research on methods to implement and assess functional restoration projects is in its infancy. A plethora of new studies worldwide provide data on why and how rivers are being restored as well as the project outcomes. Measurable improvements postrestoration vary by restoration method and measure of outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091935

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 135 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Amirault H, 2012, Stream restoration in Canada—the state of the union (or perhaps confederation)
  2. Doremus H, 2013, J. Energy Environ. Law, 4, 46
  3. Febria CM, 2014, How Can an Ecosystem Services Approach Help Address Global Water Challenges?
  4. Forman I, 2011, Columbia Environ. Law, 36, 163
  5. Gobster PH, 2000, Restoring Nature
  6. Iovanna R, 2006, S, 60, 473
  7. Rosgen D, 1998, Applied Stream Geomorphology
  8. SER (Soc. Ecol. Restor.) Int. Soc. Sci. Policy Work. Group, 2004, SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration
  9. Ji Y-X, 2008, Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin, 17, 264

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 510

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Palmer, M. A., Hondula, K. L., & Koch, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
  • National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (US)
ORCID
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2014-11-23
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
247-269
ISSN
  • 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2069
DOI
10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091935
OpenAlex
W2119503565
Cited by
475
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 16
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1052875)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
river restoration, stream restoration, channel morphology, channel reconfiguration, functional restoration, ecosystem services, climate change adaptation, restoration outcomes, restoration evaluation, hydrogeomorphic processes, biogeochemical processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review