The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Essential Oils in Insect Control: Low-Risk Products in a High-Stakes World
Abstract
In recent years, the use of essential oils (EOs) derived from aromatic plants as low-risk insecticides has increased considerably owing to their popularity with organic growers and environmentally conscious consumers. EOs are easily produced by steam distillation of plant material and contain many volatile, low-molecular-weight terpenes and phenolics. The major plant families from which EOs are extracted include Myrtaceae, Lauraceae, Lamiaceae, and Asteraceae. EOs have repellent, insecticidal, and growth-reducing effects on a variety of insects. They have been used effectively to control preharvest and postharvest phytophagous insects and as insect repellents for biting flies and for home and garden insects. The compounds exert their activities on insects through neurotoxic effects involving several mechanisms, notably through GABA, octopamine synapses, and the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase. With a few exceptions, their mammalian toxicity is low and environmental persistence is short. Registration has been the main bottleneck in putting new products on the market, but more EOs have been approved for use in the United States than elsewhere owing to reduced-risk processes for these materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review
Burt, S. (2004) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022 · Cited by 10,488
Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts
Hammer, K. A., Carson, C. F., & Riley, T. V. (1999) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00780.x · Cited by 2,560
Selection for resistance to azadirachtin in the green peach aphid,Myzus persicae
Feng, R., & Isman, M. B. (1995) · Experientia · doi:10.1007/bf01922438 · Cited by 249
Cited by
Essential Oils as Ecofriendly Biopesticides? Challenges and Constraints
Pavela, R., & Benelli, G. (2016) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2016.10.005 · Cited by 1,162
Essential oils for the development of eco-friendly mosquito larvicides: A review
Pavela, R. (2015) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.050 · Cited by 788
Green Pesticides: Essential Oils as Biopesticides in Insect-pest Management
Mossa, A.-T. H. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.3923/jest.2016.354.378 · Cited by 454
Use of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: Future perspectives
Campos, E. V. R., Proença, P. L. F., Oliveira, J. L., Bakshi, M., Abhilash, P. C., & Fraceto, L. F. (2019) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.038 · Cited by 412
Essential oils as multicomponent mixtures and their potential for human health and well-being
Bunse, M., Daniels, R., Gründemann, C., Heilmann, J., Kammerer, D. R., Keusgen, M., Lindequist, U., Melzig, M. F., Morlock, G. E., Schulz, H., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.956541 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Regnault-Roger, C., Vincent, C., & Arnason, J. T.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-01-07
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 405-424
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2149960703
- Cited by
- 1,245
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Essential Oils in Insect Control: Low-Risk Products in a High-Stakes World. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100554
- The paper
- Regnault-Roger, C., Vincent, C., & Arnason, J. T. (2012). Essential Oils in Insect Control: Low-Risk Products in a High-Stakes World. Annual Review of Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.