Cited by 2,560Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityInsect Pest Control StrategiesAntimicrobial agents and applications

Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts

Hammer, K. A., Carson, C. F., Riley, T. V.·1999·Journal of Applied Microbiology

Abstract

The antimicrobial activity of plant oils and extracts has been recognized for many years. However, few investigations have compared large numbers of oils and extracts using methods that are directly comparable. In the present study, 52 plant oils and extracts were investigated for activity against Acinetobacter baumanii, Aeromonas veronii biogroup sobria, Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia col, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype typhimurium, Serratia marcescens and Staphylococcus aureus, using an agar dilution method. Lemongrass, oregano and bay inhibited all organisms at concentrations of < or = 2.0% (v/v). Six oils did not inhibit any organisms at the highest concentration, which was 2.0% (v/v) oil for apricot kernel, evening primrose, macadamia, pumpkin, sage and sweet almond. Variable activity was recorded for the remaining oils. Twenty of the plant oils and extracts were investigated, using a broth microdilution method, for activity against C. albicans, Staph. aureus and E. coli. The lowest minimum inhibitory concentrations were 0.03% (v/v) thyme oil against C. albicans and E. coli and 0.008% (v/v) vetiver oil against Staph. aureus. These results support the notion that plant essential oils and extracts may have a role as pharmaceuticals and preservatives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00780.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammer, K. A., Carson, C. F., & Riley, T. V.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Published
1999-06
Volume
86
Issue
6
Pages
985-990
ISSN
  • 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2672
OpenAlex
W1976656293
Cited by
2,560
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 139 · 2017: 155 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 165 · 2013: 138 · 2012: 146
FWCI
26.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
essential oils, plant extracts, antimicrobial activity, minimum inhibitory concentration, Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, thyme essential oil, vetiver oil, lemongrass essential oil, oregano essential oil, preservatives, pharmaceuticals
MeSH terms
Anti-Infective Agents, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Candida albicans, Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Oils, Volatile, Plant Extracts, Plant Oils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review