CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 184Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementWaste Management and Recycling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 177 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Waste to Resource: The Trade in Wastes and Global Recycling Economies

Open access
Gregson, Nicky, Crang, Mike·2015·Annual Review of Environment and Resources
DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021105
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We outline the frameworks that shape and hold apart waste debates in and about the Global North and Global South and that hinder analysis of flows between them. Typically, waste is addressed as municipal waste, resulting in a focus on domestic consumption and urban governance and an emphasis on cities and the national scale. The prevailing ways of addressing the increasingly global flows of wastes between the North and South are those of global environmental justice and are underpinned by the geographical imagination encoded in the Basel Convention. New research on the trades in used goods and recycling in lower income countries challenges these accounts. It shows that arguments about dumping on the South need revision. Wastes are secondary resources for lower income countries, harvesting them is a significant economic activity, and consequent resource recovery is a key part of the global economy. Four areas for future research are identified: (a) changing patterns of global harvesting, (b) attempts to rescale resource recovery and the challenges faced, (c) the geopolitics of resource recovery, and (d) changes in resource recovery in lower income countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021105

Cites

176 of 176 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 177 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Medina M, 2007, The World's Scavengers
  2. Clapp J, 2001, Toxic Exports: The Transfer of Hazardous Waste from Rich to Poor Countries
  3. Basel Action Network (BAN), 2002, Exporting Harm: The High-Tech Trashing of Asia
  4. 10.1080/09640560802666610 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Gregson N, 2007, Living with Things: Accommodation, Ridding, Dwelling
  6. Ferrell J, 2006, Empire of Scrounge
  7. Birkbeck C, 1978, World Dev., 6, 1177
  8. Gill K, 2012, Of Poverty and Plastic: Scavenging and Scrap Trading Entrepreneurs in India's Informal Economy
  9. United Church Christ's Comm. Racial Justice, 1987, Toxic Waste and Race in the US.
  10. Kellow A, 1999, Agenda, 6, 29
  11. Reddy R, 2013, Econ. Polit. Wkly., 48, 63

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–184 of 184

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gregson, N., & Crang, M.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2015-11-04
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
151-176
ISSN
  • 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2050
DOI
10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021105
OpenAlex
W2135561930
Cited by
184
References
177
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Environment and Resources (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
waste trade, recycling economy, resource recovery, North-South relations, Basel Convention, environmental justice, waste dumping, used goods trade, low-income countries, municipal solid waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review