The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Tiniest Tiny Genomes
Open accessAbstract
Starting in 2006, surprisingly tiny genomes have been discovered from numerous bacterial symbionts of insect hosts. Despite their size, each retains some genes that enable provisioning of limiting nutrients or other capabilities required by hosts. Genome sequence analyses show that genome reduction is an ongoing process, resulting in a continuum of sizes, with the smallest genome currently known at 112 kilobases. Genome reduction is typical in host-restricted symbionts and pathogens, but the tiniest genomes are restricted to symbionts required by hosts and restricted to specialized host cells, resulting from long coevolution with hosts. Genes are lost in all functional categories, but core genes for central informational processes, including genes encoding ribosomal proteins, are mostly retained, whereas genes underlying production of cell envelope components are especially depleted. Thus, these entities retain cell-like properties but are heavily dependent on coadaptation of hosts, which continuously evolve to support the symbionts upon which they depend.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent evolution of metabolic roles in bacterial co-symbionts of insects
McCutcheon, J. P., McDonald, B. R., & Moran, N. A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906424106 · Cited by 384
Self-citation
Cited by
Endosymbiosis and Eukaryotic Cell Evolution
Archibald, J. M. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.055 · Cited by 654
Heritable symbiosis: The advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole
Bennett, G. M., & Moran, N. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1421388112 · Cited by 526
Self-citationBiology and evolution of bacterial toxin–antitoxin systems
Jurėnas, D., Fraikin, N., Goormaghtigh, F., & Van Melderen, L. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00661-1 · Cited by 458
Biosynthetic capacity, metabolic variety and unusual biology in the CPR and DPANN radiations
Castelle, C. J., Brown, C. T., Anantharaman, K., Probst, A. J., Huang, R. H., & Banfield, J. F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0076-2 · Cited by 454
The evolution of host-symbiont dependence
Fisher, R. M., Henry, L. M., Cornwallis, C. K., Kiers, E. T., & West, S. A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15973 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Moran, N. A., & Bennett, G. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-09-08
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 195-215
- ISSN
- 0066-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3251
- OpenAlex
- W2168917114
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Tiniest Tiny Genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-micro-091213-112901
- The paper
- Moran, N. A., & Bennett, G. M. (2014). The Tiniest Tiny Genomes. Annual Review of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-091213-112901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.