The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heritable symbiosis: The advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole
Open accessAbstract
Many eukaryotes have obligate associations with microorganisms that are transmitted directly between generations. A model for heritable symbiosis is the association of aphids, a clade of sap-feeding insects, and Buchnera aphidicola , a gammaproteobacterium that colonized an aphid ancestor 150 million years ago and persists in almost all 5,000 aphid species. Symbiont acquisition enables evolutionary and ecological expansion; aphids are one of many insect groups that would not exist without heritable symbiosis. Receiving less attention are potential negative ramifications of symbiotic alliances. In the short run, symbionts impose metabolic costs. Over evolutionary time, hosts evolve dependence beyond the original benefits of the symbiosis. Symbiotic partners enter into an evolutionary spiral that leads to irreversible codependence and associated risks. Host adaptations to symbiosis (e.g., immune-system modification) may impose vulnerabilities. Symbiont genomes also continuously accumulate deleterious mutations, limiting their beneficial contributions and environmental tolerance. Finally, the fitness interests of obligate heritable symbionts are distinct from those of their hosts, leading to selfish tendencies. Thus, genes underlying the host–symbiont interface are predicted to follow a coevolutionary arms race, as observed for genes governing host–pathogen interactions. On the macroevolutionary scale, the rapid evolution of interacting symbiont and host genes is predicted to accelerate host speciation rates by generating genetic incompatibilities. However, degeneration of symbiont genomes may ultimately limit the ecological range of host species, potentially increasing extinction risk. Recent results for the aphid– Buchnera symbiosis and related systems illustrate that, whereas heritable symbiosis can expand ecological range and spur diversification, it also presents potential perils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology
Werren, J. H., Baldo, L., & Clark, M. E. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1969 · Cited by 2,819
Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution
Misof, B., Liu, S., Meusemann, K., Peters, R. S., Donath, A., Mayer, C., Frandsen, P. B., Ware, J., Flouri, T., Beutel, R. G., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1257570 · Cited by 2,694
Grimaldi, D. A., & Engel, M. S. (2005) · Cited by 2,618
Genomics and Evolution of Heritable Bacterial Symbionts
Moran, N. A., McCutcheon, J. P., & Nakabachi, A. (2008) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130119 · Cited by 1,737
Self-citationThe origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698
Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria
McCutcheon, J. P., & Moran, N. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2670 · Cited by 1,464
Self-citationNutritional Interactions in Insect-Microbial Symbioses: Aphids and Their Symbiotic Bacteria Buchnera
Douglas, A. E. (1998) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.17 · Cited by 1,386
Genome Sequence of the Pea Aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum
The International Aphid Genomics Consortium (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000313 · Cited by 1,314
Genome sequence of the endocellular bacterial symbiont of aphids Buchnera sp. APS
Shigenobu, S., Watanabe, H., Hattori, M., Sakaki, Y., & Ishikawa, H. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35024074 · Cited by 1,309
BIOLOGY OF BACTERIOCYTE-ASSOCIATED ENDOSYMBIONTS OF PLANT SAP-SUCKING INSECTS
Baumann, P. (2005) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121041 · Cited by 1,050
Cited by
The Hologenome Concept: Helpful or Hollow?
Moran, N. A., & Sloan, D. B. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002311 · Cited by 508
Self-citationUnraveling the processes shaping mammalian gut microbiomes over evolutionary time
Groussin, M., Mazel, F., Sanders, J. G., Smillie, C. S., Lavergne, S., Thuiller, W., & Alm, E. J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14319 · Cited by 508
Caterpillars lack a resident gut microbiome
Hammer, T. J., Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs, W., Jaffe, S. P., & Fierer, N. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1707186114 · Cited by 481
Microbial evolution and transitions along the parasite–mutualist continuum
Drew, G. C., Stevens, E. J., & King, K. C. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00550-7 · Cited by 339
The evolution of host-symbiont dependence
Fisher, R. M., Henry, L. M., Cornwallis, C. K., Kiers, E. T., & West, S. A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15973 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, G. M., & Moran, N. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2015-02-23
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 10169-10176
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2125310261
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 50.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heritable symbiosis: The advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1421388112
- The paper
- Bennett, G. M., & Moran, N. A. (2015). Heritable symbiosis: The advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421388112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.