Cited by 309Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysProtein Degradation and InhibitorsMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Proteasome Inhibitor Drugs

Fricker, Lloyd D.·2020·Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Abstract

Proteasomes are large, multicatalytic protein complexes that cleave cellular proteins into peptides. There are many distinct forms of proteasomes that differ in catalytically active subunits, regulatory subunits, and associated proteins. Proteasome inhibitors are an important class of drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, and they are being investigated for other diseases. Bortezomib (Velcade) was the first proteasome inhibitor to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Carfilzomib (Kyprolis) and ixazomib (Ninlaro) have recently been approved, and more drugs are in development. While the primary mechanism of action is inhibition of the proteasome, the downstream events that lead to selective cell death are not entirely clear. Proteasome inhibitors have been found to affect protein turnover but at concentrations that are much higher than those achieved clinically, raising the possibility that some of the effects of proteasome inhibitors are mediated by other mechanisms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010919-023603

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 137 · Cited by 309

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Spano JP, 2005, Bull. Cancer, 92, 61
  2. Adams J, 1999, Cancer Res, 59, 2615
  3. Sunwoo JB, 2001, Clin. Cancer Res., 7, 1419
  4. Cusack JC, 2001, Cancer Res, 61, 3535
  5. Hideshima T, 2001, Cancer Res, 61, 3071
  6. Ling YH, 2003, Clin. Cancer Res., 9, 1145
  7. Wang H, 2018, Oncol. Rep., 40, 2343
  8. Schwartz R, 2004, Oncology, 18, 14

Metadata

Authors
Fricker, L. D.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Fricker, Lloyd D.
Venue
Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Published
2020-01-06
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
457-476
ISSN
  • 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4304
OpenAlex
W2971941127
Cited by
309
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 14
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Keywords
proteasome inhibitors, proteasome, bortezomib, carfilzomib, ixazomib, multiple myeloma, mantle cell lymphoma, mechanism of action, protein turnover, drug development, drug toxicity
MeSH terms
Drug Development, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Proteasome Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review