Cited by 127Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipid metabolism and disorders

Targeting PCSK9 for hypercholesterolemia

Open access
Norata, Giuseppe Danilo, Tibolla, Gianpaolo, Catapano, Alberico Luigi·2014·Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Abstract

Dyslipidemias are a predominant risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Biological and genetic research has led to the identification of several genes and proteins that may be pharmacologically targeted to improve lipoprotein profiles and possibly cardiovascular outcomes in patients with dyslipidemia. The observation that proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) regulates the levels of circulating low-density lipoprotein C (LDL-C) by enhancing the degradation of the hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) prompted the search for drugs that inhibit PCSK9 activity. Several approaches to inhibiting PCSK9 activity have been proposed; these involve inhibitory antibodies, small molecules, and gene silencing. To date, the most promising and advanced approach relates to monoclonal antibodies, which can decrease LDL cholesterol by 65–70%, even as an add-on therapy to a maximal dose of a statin. Phase III studies and large, event-driven clinical trials are ongoing and will fully address the viability and role of these drugs in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011613-140025

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 111 · Cited by 127

Authors
Norata, G. D., Tibolla, G., & Catapano, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Published
2014-01-06
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
273-293
ISSN
  • 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4304
OpenAlex
W2156405428
Cited by
127
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Università degli Studi di Milano (PUR 2009)
  • Fondazione Cariplo (2009-2582, 2010-0768)
  • Regione Lombardia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
PCSK9, hypercholesterolemia, LDL cholesterol, LDL receptor degradation, PCSK9 inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, small molecule inhibitors, gene silencing, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Proprotein Convertase 9, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Disease Models, Animal, Gene Expression Regulation, Hypercholesterolemia, Cholesterol, LDL, Serine Endopeptidases, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Proprotein Convertases, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review