Cited by 422Political Science Research and EducationQualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Race as a Bundle of Sticks: Designs that Estimate Effects of Seemingly Immutable Characteristics

Open access
Sen, Maya, Wasow, Omar·2016·Annual Review of Political Science

Abstract

Although understanding the role of race, ethnicity, and identity is central to political science, methodological debates persist about whether it is possible to estimate the effect of something immutable. At the heart of the debate is an older theoretical question: Is race best understood under an essentialist or constructivist framework? In contrast to the “immutable characteristics” or essentialist approach, we argue that race should be operationalized as a “bundle of sticks” that can be disaggregated into elements. With elements of race, causal claims may be possible using two designs: (a) studies that measure the effect of exposure to a racial cue and (b) studies that exploit within-group variation to measure the effect of some manipulable element. These designs can reconcile scholarship on race and causation and offer a clear framework for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-polisci-032015-010015

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sen and Wasow's bundle of sticks framework theorizes race as a composite variable that can be disaggregated into constitutive elements, some of which can be manipulated.

    “Sen and Wasow's 'bundle of sticks' framework theorizes race as a composite variable that can be disaggregated into constitutive elements, some of which can be manipulated [109].”

    From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [109]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sen, M., & Wasow, O.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
2016-05-11
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
499-522
ISSN
  • 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1577
OpenAlex
W2162068690
Cited by
422
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
29.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
race, ethnicity, racial identity, essentialism, constructivism, racial cues, within-group variation, causal inference, racial inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review